- Page 1: Weeki Wachee River System Recommend
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPO
- Page 7 and 8: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Florida
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 5-3 Number of Aerial Manatee
- Page 11 and 12: Table 5-1 Benthos Response to Salin
- Page 13 and 14: Preface This report was prepared by
- Page 15 and 16: criterion at a five percentage flow
- Page 17 and 18: 10) Navigation". Because minimum fl
- Page 19 and 20: systems are inherently dynamic” (
- Page 21 and 22: 1.4.2 Minimum Evaluation Criteria R
- Page 23 and 24: information available', at some poi
- Page 25 and 26: for some organisms; for example, ce
- Page 27 and 28: Cow Pen Slough (CPS). Some exist fo
- Page 29 and 30: The surface drainage area is approx
- Page 31 and 32: Table 2-1 Watershed and Springshed
- Page 33 and 34: 1965) or Unnamed Spring No. 3 (Rose
- Page 35 and 36: averages 55.8 inches at nearby Broo
- Page 37 and 38: undulating topography. Karst featur
- Page 39 and 40: ut virtually all of these occurred
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 2-11 Flow Comparison - Basel
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 2-13 Weeki Wachee Springshed
- Page 45 and 46: were similarly evaluated. Initial r
- Page 47 and 48: links both systems. One of the many
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 2-17 Observed and Adjusted F
- Page 51 and 52: October 26). This is the period whe
- Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 3 - ESTUARY CHARACTERISTICS
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 3-1 Bayport (28 o 32.0' N 82
- Page 57 and 58:
species include Hydrilla verticilla
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 3-2 Results of Weeki Wachee S
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3-3 Percentage of Weeki Wache
- Page 63 and 64:
Figure 3-8 Aerial Photograph Illust
- Page 65 and 66:
gauge height. Harmonics were develo
- Page 67 and 68:
importance is the dampened upstream
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 4-6 Number of Salinity Measu
- Page 71 and 72:
Several physical-chemical condition
- Page 73 and 74:
Following segmentation, the effect
- Page 75 and 76:
predicting salinity elsewhere in th
- Page 77 and 78:
Table 4-6. Step-Wise Salinity Regre
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 4-7. Correlation (LOC) Summar
- Page 81 and 82:
where the values of one independent
- Page 83 and 84:
Table 4-8 (Continued) Median Water
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 4-12 Salinity and Dissolved
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 5-2 Benthos Response to Norma
- Page 89 and 90:
5.2 Fish 5.2.1 Descriptive (Adapted
- Page 91 and 92:
5.2.1.2 Invertebrate Composition Th
- Page 93 and 94:
5.2.2.1 Distribution - Plankton Net
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 5-8 Abundance response to Inf
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 5-2 Abundance Response to Fl
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 5-10. Average Number of Surve
- Page 101 and 102:
5.4 Mollusc 5.4.1 Descriptive Durin
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5-5(b) Molluscan Presence /
- Page 105 and 106:
The most common molluscs present ar
- Page 107 and 108:
CHAPTER 6 - RESOURCES OF CONCERN &
- Page 109 and 110:
6.1.2 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 6-2 Example of Change in Vol
- Page 113 and 114:
6.2 Resource Criteria / Goals - Fre
- Page 115 and 116:
CHAPTER 7 - TECHNICAL APPROACH 7.1
- Page 117 and 118:
A time series(October 1, 2000 throu
- Page 119 and 120:
The loss of thermal refuge was dete
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 7-5 Number of Manatees Suppo
- Page 123 and 124:
Using diversity as an example, sali
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 5-13), resulting in an estima
- Page 127 and 128:
CHAPTER 8 - CONCLUSIONS AND DISTRIC
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 8-1 Summary of Weeki Wachee
- Page 131 and 132:
CHAPTER 9 - LITERATURE CITED 9.1 Li
- Page 133 and 134:
Jones, G.W., S.B. Upchurch, K.M. Ch
- Page 135 and 136:
Dixon, L.K. 1986. Water Chemistry.
- Page 137 and 138:
Kelly, M., A. Munson, J. Morales an
- Page 139 and 140:
assumption that is also not necessa
- Page 141 and 142:
The "d1" and "d2" wavelets represen
- Page 143 and 144:
kernel smoothing, and so on. The di
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 7 Location of Weeki Wachee G
- Page 147 and 148:
Regression Model of Weeki Wachee Fl
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 1. Location of Weeki Wachee
- Page 151 and 152:
Figure 3. Groundwater grid used in
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 5. INTB scenario where impac
- Page 155 and 156:
3.1.2 Tampa Bay Water Wellfield Red
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 9. Predicted increase in UFA
- Page 159 and 160:
the eastern part of the model domai
- Page 161 and 162:
Southwest Florida Water Management
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix 3-1 (Continued) Macrophyte
- Page 165 and 166:
P1_C = 0.13085372 Q1_S = -0.0576643
- Page 167 and 168:
Data Sources, continued. Associated
- Page 169 and 170:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 171 and 172:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 173 and 174:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 175 and 176:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 177 and 178:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 179 and 180:
Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
- Page 181 and 182:
warm water habitat is not compromis
- Page 183 and 184:
Martin Kelly, Ph.D. Page 2 October
- Page 185 and 186:
Scientific Peer Review of the Propo
- Page 187 and 188:
such a public policy decision. More
- Page 189 and 190:
Scientific Peer Review of the Propo
- Page 191 and 192:
GENERAL COMMENTS Overall, the Distr
- Page 193 and 194:
the distribution of plants, benthic
- Page 195 and 196:
300 300 250 250 Annual Discharge (c
- Page 197 and 198:
It is possible that the effect of p
- Page 199 and 200:
egression equation for the harmonic
- Page 201 and 202:
A Task Committee of the American So
- Page 203 and 204:
comparison very well in these plots
- Page 205 and 206:
Determining the Impact of Flow Redu
- Page 207 and 208:
factor in SAV production, while the
- Page 209 and 210:
Fish and Planktonic Invertebrates M
- Page 211 and 212:
flow reduction) and seasonal Block
- Page 213 and 214:
Page Paragraph Line Comment 8 As a
- Page 215 and 216:
Page Paragraph Line Comment 14 •
- Page 217 and 218:
Page Paragraph Line Comment 21 1 Th
- Page 219 and 220:
Page Paragraph Line Comment 36 2 7
- Page 221 and 222:
Jaeger, J.E. 1973. The determinatio
- Page 223 and 224:
Staff Response to: Scientific Peer
- Page 225 and 226:
=0.86) while the r 2 adj of the rev
- Page 227 and 228:
The peer review has also commented
- Page 229 and 230:
Mud River Boundary Condition The Mu
- Page 231 and 232:
Page 30-31 Page 32 Paragraph 2 Page
- Page 233 and 234:
Attachement 3. - Sharps Ferry Well
- Page 235:
Figure 2. Estimated and metered 200