The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Delivered by The World Bank e-library to: unknown IP : 192.86.100.35 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:16:23 (c) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
References Aedo, C. 1997. “Organización Industrial de la Prestación de Servicios Sociales.” Working Paper Series R-302. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. Aedo, C., and O. Larrañaga. 1994. “Educación Privada vs. Pública en Chile: Calidad y Sesgo de Selección.” Graduate Economics Program, Santiago, and Instituto Latinoamericano de Doctrinas y Estudios Sociales Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Ahlin, A. 2003. “Does School Competition Matter? Effects of a Large-Scale School Choice Reform on Student Performance.” Department of Economics, Uppsala University, Sweden. Allcott, H., and D. E. Ortega. 2007. “The Performance of Decentralized School Systems: Evidence from Fe y Alegría in Venezuela” Presented at the Conference on Public-Private Partnerships in Education, World Bank, Washington DC, June 7–8. Andersen, S. C. 2005. “Selection and Competition Effects in a Large-Scale School Voucher System.” For presentation at the conference European Public Choice Society 1005, University of Durham, United Kingdom, March 31 to 3 April. ———. “Private Schools and the Parents That Choose Them: Empirical Evidence from the Danish School Voucher System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31(1): 69. Andrabi, T., J. Das, and A. I. Khwaja. 2006. “A Dime a Day: The Possibilities and Limits of Private Schooling in Pakistan.” Policy Research Working Paper 4066. World Bank, Washington, DC. Andrabi, T., J. Das, A. I. Khwaja, T. Vishwanath, and T. Zajonc. 2007. “Learning and Educational Achievements in Punjab Schools (Leaps): Insights to Inform the Education Policy Debate.” World Bank, Washington, DC. Angrist, J., E. Bettinger, E. Bloom, E. King, and M. Kremer. 2002. “Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment.” American Economic Review 92(5): 1535–58. Angrist, J., E. Bettinger, and M. Kremer. 2006. “Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: Evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia.” American Economic Review 96(3): 847–62. Aslam, M. 2007. “The Relative Effectiveness of Government and Private Schools in Pakistan: Are Girls Worse Off?” RECOUP Working Paper 4. University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Audit Office of New South Wales. 2006. “The New Schools Privately Financed Project.” Sydney. Baksh, Shaista. Forthcoming. “Public-Private Partnerships in World Bank Education Lending, 1998–2007: Background Report for the Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education.” World Bank, Washington, DC. Barrera-Osorio, F. 2007. “The Impact of Private Provision of Public Education: Empirical Evidence from Bogota’s Concession Schools.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4121, Washington, DC. Barrera-Osorio, F., and H. A. Patrinos. 2009. “An International Perspective on School Vouchers” in Handbook of Research on School Choice, Peabody College at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. Bedi, A. S., and A. Garg. 2000. “The Effectiveness of Private Versus Public Schools: The Case of Indonesia.” Journal of Development Economics 69(2): 463–494. Belfield, C. R., and A. L. Wooten. 2003. “Education Privatization: The Attitudes and Experiences of Superintendents.” Occasional Paper 70. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Columbia University, Delivered by The World Bank e-library to: New York. unknown Bell, S. 1995 IP : 192.86.100.35 “Sharing the Wealth: Privatization Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:16:23 through Broad-Based Ownership Strategies.” 85 (c) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
Page 1 and 2:
The Role and Impact of Public-Priva
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Foreword ix Acknowledgment
Page 9 and 10:
Contents vii Boxes 1.1 Sources of c
Page 11 and 12:
Foreword Education is widely believ
Page 13 and 14:
Acknowledgments We acknowledge the
Page 15 and 16:
Abbreviations AVEC BRAC BTL CARE ES
Page 17 and 18:
Introduction Despite recent increas
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction 3 schools (for example
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction 5 PPPs may face resist
Page 23 and 24:
Introduction 7 recent (such as thos
Page 25 and 26:
Understanding Public-Private Partne
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
International Experience While gove
Page 33 and 34:
International Experience 17 Countri
Page 35 and 36:
International Experience 19 BOX 2.1
Page 37 and 38:
International Experience 21 of stud
Page 39 and 40:
International Experience 23 of trad
Page 41 and 42:
International Experience 25 to prov
Page 43 and 44:
International Experience 27 allocat
Page 45 and 46:
International Experience 29 student
Page 47 and 48:
What Do We Know about Public-Privat
Page 49 and 50: What Do We Know About Public-Privat
Page 59 and 60: Designing a Conducive Environment f
Page 75 and 76: Conclusions Despite recent increase
Page 77 and 78: Conclusions 61 for providing educat
Page 79 and 80: Conclusions 63 The United States ha
Page 81 and 82: Conclusions 65 limited data, and, t
Page 83 and 84: Conclusions 67 funding system shoul
Page 85 and 86: Conclusions 69 system is a persiste
Page 87 and 88: Public-Private Partnerships: Progra
Page 99: appendix BMethods for Evaluation of
Page 103 and 104: References 87 in Emerging Economies
Page 105 and 106: References 89 Discussion Paper 2003
Page 107 and 108: References 91 ———. 2003b. Par
Page 109 and 110: Index Boxes, figures, and tables ar
Page 111 and 112: Index 95 H Haiti, 18, 19b, 73 Heckm
Page 113 and 114: Index 97 schools. See also charter
Page 115 and 116: Delivered by The World Bank e-libra
show all

The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?