30.10.2014 Views

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<br />

<strong>Wolf</strong> <strong>for</strong>got to apply 1 Thessalonians 5:21, which reads the same in any edition of the 1611 Holy Bible,<br />

showing yet again that he doesn’t know the Bible very well.<br />

“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”<br />

Other editions of the 1611 Holy Bible, e.g. the Cambridge Concord Edition, do not make any reference<br />

to the church in the page headings <strong>for</strong> Isaiah 43, 44, 45. By <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong>’s reasoning, there<strong>for</strong>e, God<br />

must have inspired corrections to the page headings, if such were in fact needed.<br />

Note Acts 7:38.<br />

“This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount<br />

Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:”<br />

Note further the correspondence between Exodus 19:6 addressed to Israel and 1 Peter 2:9 addressed to<br />

the church, called “the strangers” but also “Elect” 1 Peter 2:1, 2.<br />

“And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou<br />

shalt speak unto the children of Israel.”<br />

“But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should<br />

shew <strong>for</strong>th the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:”<br />

The King’s men may have thought that they were referring directly to “the church of God” 1 Corinthians<br />

1:2, 10:32, 11:22, 15:9, 2 Corinthians 1:1, Galatians 1:13, 1 Timothy 3:5 but inspection of Acts<br />

7:38, Exodus 19:6, 1 Peter 2:9 suggests that they were considerably more God-guided in their manmade<br />

chapter summaries <strong>for</strong> Isaiah 43, 44, 45 than they are usually given credit <strong>for</strong>.<br />

19. Why would the translators use book headings like “The Gospel According to Saint Luke” since the<br />

Greek merely says “The Gospel According to Luke”? The Catholic cannonizes Luke as a Saint and that<br />

becomes inspired by God to be in the KJV?<br />

Question 19 is yet another feeble attempt by <strong>Wolf</strong> at guilt by association. Aside from the fact that, regardless<br />

of any Catholic practice, New Testament Christians, including the writers of the Gospels, are<br />

“called to be saints” 1 Corinthians 1:1 i.e. in perpetuity, it is <strong>Wolf</strong>’s responsibility to disclose any association<br />

between the 1611 Holy Bible and Catholicism, which he does not do. That aspect of <strong>Wolf</strong>’s innuendo<br />

can there<strong>for</strong>e be ignored.<br />

He should, however, read Did the Catholic Church Give Us the Bible? by David W. Daniels,<br />

www.chick.com/catalog/books/1252.asp, <strong>for</strong> some enlightenment on Rome’s attitude to the 1611 Holy<br />

Bible.<br />

<strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong> states that “the Greek merely says “The Gospel According to Luke”” again without<br />

identifying to which ‘Greek’ that he is referring so that aspect of his innuendo against the 1611 Holy<br />

Bible may reasonably be ignored as well. However, a book title that states ““The Gospel According to<br />

Luke”” immediately begs the question, who is Luke? Designation of the Gospel writers as Saint Matthew,<br />

Saint Mark, Saint Luke and Saint John has the advantage of identifying them as the Lord’s immediate<br />

followers who are there<strong>for</strong>e the first individuals with those particular names “called to be saints”<br />

in the New Testament sense. The designation Paul the Apostle as the writer of the Pauline Epistles<br />

serves the same purpose of identification. <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong> <strong>for</strong>got to check the later epistles where the<br />

writers are mentioned explicitly and where they are simply referred to as James, Peter and John. The<br />

designation Saint has been dropped because the Gospels have already identified “Peter, James, and<br />

John” Matthew 17:1 as “the first three” 2 Samuel 23:19, 23, 1 Chronicles 11:21, 25 of the Lord’s disciples<br />

who later became apostles. See Mark 5:37, 9:2, 13:3, 14:33, Luke 6:14, 8:21, 9:28.<br />

The Book of Revelation is exceptional in that its writer is designated Saint John the Divine because<br />

identification of apostolic authorship is especially vital <strong>for</strong> this Book that closes the canon and because<br />

John was at the time of writing the last survivor of “the apostles of the Lord” 2 Peter 3:2.<br />

The above in<strong>for</strong>mation emerges by simply obeying the Lord’s command to “Search the scriptures”<br />

John 5:39.<br />

“Being disobedient” 1 Peter 2:8 in that respect, <strong>Wolf</strong> continues to abide by 1 Corinthians 14:38.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!