A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

45
If he is saved, Grievous Wolf stands to reap the ashes of “wood, hay, stubble” 1 Corinthians 3:12, 13 at
“the judgment seat of Christ” Romans 14:10, according to Proverbs 13:13. Wolf should be thankful he
doesn’t live in Old Testament times in that only his works will burn up, not his person.
“Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed: but he that feareth the commandment shall be rewarded.”
Grievous Wolf also fails to appreciate that God can edit His Book in just the same way that any human
author can. See Dr Ruckman’s comments in the Ruckman Reference Bible p 1238 with respect to Matthew
2:18, which is one of numerous New Testament quotations from the Old Testament that don’t precisely
match their Old Testament counterparts. Note also Jeremiah 36:32.
“Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote
therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had
burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words.”
41. Did the great Protestant Reformation (1517-1603) take place without “the word of God” since the KJV
was not in existence? Did Martin Luther need the KJV to get a revelation of grace salvation and that
the Papacy was in error on at least 95 doctrinal points?
See Questions 28, 30, with respect to the purification process of Psalm 12:6, 7 that Grievous Wolf still
doesn’t understand.
42. What copy or translations of “the Word of God,” used by the Reformers, was absolutely the infallible
and inerrant Word? [their main Bibles are well-known and copies still exist but they are not the KJV].
See Questions 28, 30, with respect to the purification process of Psalm 12:6, 7 that Grievous Wolf still
doesn’t understand.
43. If the KJV is “God’s only infallible and preserved word to the English-speaking people,” did the “English-speaking
people” have “the word of God” at all in the other English versions before 1611?
See Questions 28, 30, with respect to the purification process of Psalm 12:6, 7 that Grievous Wolf still
doesn’t understand.
Dr Mrs Riplinger states that the Bible translators of the English Reformation “described their vernacular
translations as “scripture,” whose author was God.” She adds that “Martyr and Archbishop
Thomas Cranmer, wrote in his Prologue to the Great Bible that it was “given” by the “holy spirit.””
See In Awe of Thy Word pp 757-759, 805, 846-847.
Cranmer (martyred), Tyndale (martyred), Coverdale, Rogers (martyred) and the other Bible translators
of the English Reformation, plus Wycliffe before them believed that they had in their hands “all scripture...given
by inspiration of God” in English. In contrast to the apostates described in Romans 1:18,
like Grievous Wolf, they believed that they held the truth in righteousness. This inspired English scripture
reached its final purified stage with the Holy Bible of 1611, Psalm 12:6, 7, thereby superseding in
both inspiration and authority the earlier English versions. See also Hazardous Materials, pp 1165-
1167.
44. Were the English versions of Tyndale’s [1525], or Coverdale’s [1535], or Matthew’s [1537], or the
Great [1539], or the Geneva [1560], absolutely infallible? Would God not inspire them to be error free
as well as with the KJV or does God pick and choose which version he will preserve and “allow” the
others to have errors?
See Questions 28, 30, with respect to the purification process of Psalm 12:6, 7 that Grievous Wolf still
doesn’t understand. See additional remarks under Questions 43.
45. If neither the KJV nor any other one version were absolutely 100% without error, could a lost sinner
still find salvation and be “born again” by the “incorruptible word of God” [Acts 2:38, 1 Peter 1:23]?
The answer is YES!
So why bother asking the question?