A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth
A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth
A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
66<br />
that when any man “holds the truth in unrighteousness” Romans 1:18, by exalting HIS own authority<br />
over that of [the 1611 HOLY BIBLE], he CEASES to be ‘good’ and he ceases to be ‘godly’.<br />
“My glory will I not give to another” Isaiah 42:8, not Torrey, not Spurgeon, not Ryle, not Calvin, not<br />
Wesley, not Moody, not Scofield, not ANY other.<br />
The above statement illustrates another deceptive stratagem that Malcolm Bowden lists in his book Science<br />
vs Evolution. See Question 51.<br />
Under Question 51, <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong> used the deceptive stratagem of what Malcolm Bowden terms Guilt<br />
(or Denigration) by Association (no. 25 in Bowden’s list) in order to denigrate the 1611 Holy Bible by<br />
allusion to translator Richard Thomson’s drinking. Under Questions 61, 62, <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong> is attempting<br />
to subvert the 1611 Holy Bible by means of guilt (or denigration) by dissociation.<br />
Malcolm Bowden refers to that particular deceptive stratagem as Fallacious Appeal to Authority. It is<br />
no. 12 on his list. The stratagem consists of appealing to a well-known individual to act as a deciding<br />
authority in a subject in which he is not an expert.<br />
Charles Haddon Spurgeon and R. A. Torrey were well-known individuals in their respective fields of<br />
preaching and evangelism but they were not experts with respect to the text of the 1611 Holy Bible, although<br />
Spurgeon nevertheless acknowledged the inerrancy, infallibility and inspiration of the 1611 Holy<br />
Bible when “in his right mind” Mark 5:15. See Question 61.<br />
Dr William Grady notes in his book What Hath God Wrought! pp 357-379 that Torrey fell under the destructive<br />
influence of the ‘originals-onlyists’ at Moody Bible Institute and, as their student, that of the<br />
German higher critics of the Lutheran Universities of Leipzig and Erlanger with “the poison of<br />
asps...under their lips” Romans 3:13 against the 1611 Holy Bible, from which Torrey’s belief in the<br />
AV1611 suffered permanent damage.<br />
As Solomon warns in Proverbs 13:20 “He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion<br />
of fools shall be destroyed.”<br />
The Expert with respect to the text of the 1611 Holy Bible is its Author, of Whom John states in Revelation<br />
5:1:<br />
“And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside,<br />
sealed with seven seals.”<br />
This is what one of the Author’s experts with respect to that Book, Dr Miles Smith, said in The Translators<br />
To The Reader. See www.time<strong>for</strong>truth.co.uk/why-av-only/ The KJB Story 1611-2011 Abridged p<br />
21.<br />
“Ye are brought unto fountains of living water which ye digged not; do not cast earth into them with the<br />
Philistines [Genesis 26:15], neither prefer broken pits be<strong>for</strong>e them with the wicked Jews [Jeremiah<br />
2:13]. Others have laboured, and you may enter into their labours; O receive not so great things in<br />
vain, O despise not so great salvation!...a blessed thing it is, and will bring us to everlasting blessedness<br />
in the end, when God speaketh unto us, to hearken; when he setteth his word be<strong>for</strong>e us, to read it; when<br />
he stretcheth out his hand and calleth, to answer, Here am I, here we are to do thy will, O God. The<br />
Lord work a care and conscience in us to know him and serve him, that we may be acknowledged of him<br />
at the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom with the holy Ghost, be all praise and thanksgiving.<br />
Amen.”<br />
If <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong> was “in his right mind” Mark 5:15, he would listen to both the Expert, John 16:13,<br />
and the experts, like Dr Miles Smith.<br />
63. Did God supernaturally “move His Word from the original languages to English” in 1611 as affirmed<br />
by The Flaming Torch?<br />
Whatever The Flaming Torch says is irrelevant.