30.10.2014 Views

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

A Grievous Wolf - Time for Truth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<br />

“The Latin readings Erasmus had <strong>for</strong> the book of Revelation date back to the first and second century,<br />

as evidenced by the still extant Old Itala manuscripts of the book of Revelation: c (6), dem (59), g (51),<br />

h (55), m (PS-AU spe), reg (T), t (56), and z (65).”<br />

In other words, contrary to <strong>Grievous</strong> <strong>Wolf</strong>’s disin<strong>for</strong>mation, the Received Text does not rely on the<br />

Vulgate <strong>for</strong> the any part of the Book of Revelation, given that Erasmus did not use it even <strong>for</strong> the initial<br />

editions of the Received Text.<br />

Will Kinney’s article on Revelation 22:19 is also most in<strong>for</strong>mative with respect to the last 6 verses of<br />

Revelation, revealing that John <strong>Wolf</strong>’s Question 16 comes originally from the 1611 Holy Bible archsubversive<br />

Doug Kutilek. See Introduction. Note this writer’s emphases in the following extracts.<br />

See brandplucked.webs.com/rev2219bookoflife.htm and the following extracts.<br />

...Mr. Kutilek says there are no Greek manuscripts that read “book of life”. He is flat out wrong about<br />

this. Dr. Thomas Holland, Jack Moorman, Dr. H.C. Hoskier and many others have documented the textual<br />

evidence that exists <strong>for</strong> the reading of “book of life” as found in Revelation 22:19.<br />

Dr. Holland responds to this charge. You can see an excerpt from his book Crowned with Glory here:<br />

http://av1611.com/kjbp/faq/holland_re22_19.html<br />

There this question is posed and Dr. Holland responds:<br />

Question: “If the Textus Receptus is the error free text, then why are the last six verses of Revelation<br />

absent from the TR, yet present in the KJV? Did you know that <strong>for</strong> these verses, the Latin Vulgate<br />

was translated into English - a translation of a translation?”<br />

Dr. Holland replies: “The “TR” has the last six verses of Revelation in it. It is found in the editions of<br />

Erasmus, Beza, Stephanus, and the Elzevir brothers.<br />

Codex 1r, which was used by Erasmus, was missing Revelation 22:16-21. The standard teaching is that<br />

Erasmus went back to the Latin Vulgate <strong>for</strong> these verses and re-translated them into Greek. However,<br />

Dr. H. C. Hoskier disagreed by demonstrating that Erasmus used the Greek manuscript 141 which contained<br />

the verses. (Concerning The Text Of The Apocalypse, London: Quaritch, 1929, vol. 1, pp. 474-<br />

77, vol. 2, pp. 454,635.)<br />

Regardless, the textual support <strong>for</strong> these verses is not limited to the Latin Vulgate. They are also found<br />

in the Old Latin manuscripts, additional early translations such as the Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, and<br />

Ethiopic, and some later Greek manuscripts.<br />

Regarding the Greek, it should be pointed out that even today there is not a great deal of textual support<br />

<strong>for</strong> the verses in question. For example, of the early papyri there are no manuscripts of Revelation 22,<br />

or <strong>for</strong> that matter of Revelation chapters 18-22. Further, among the uncials, only five have Revelation<br />

chapter 22, and only four of these contain the last six verses (Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, 046, and 051).<br />

There are several minuscules which have been discovered which contain these verses (94, 1611, 1854,<br />

1859, 2042, and 2138 to name a few).<br />

Of course, the biggest “change” comes in verse 19. Dr. Hoskier has shown that Greek manuscripts 57<br />

and 141 read with the Latin in stating “book of life” and not “tree of life” as found in Sinaiticus and<br />

most other Greek mss. There are, of course, other witnesses to the reading found in the KJV here. For<br />

example, the Old Bohairic Coptic version also reads “book of life.” Additionally, we have patristic citations<br />

from Ambrose (340-397 AD), Bachiarius (late fourth century), and Primasius in his commentary<br />

on Revelation in 552 AD. Thus, we have evidence of the KJV reading dating from be<strong>for</strong>e the Vulgate<br />

and maintained throughout Church history in a variety of geographical locations and various languages.<br />

Will Kinney has these further important observations about Revelation 22:19 and by extension to the<br />

1611 Holy Bible text <strong>for</strong> Revelation 22:16-21.<br />

Mr. Jack Moorman, in his book “When the KJV Departs from the ‘Majority’ Text”, says the reading of<br />

“book of life” is also found in the Coptic Boharic, the Arabic, the Speculum, Pseudo-Augustine and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!