Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Natural Hazards - Planat
Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Natural Hazards - Planat
Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Natural Hazards - Planat
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12<br />
Chapter 2 — Meteorological hazards<br />
Figure 2.2 — Satellite<br />
picture of Hurricane Mitch<br />
on 26 October 1998<br />
(weakest) to 8 (strongest) as shown in Figure 2.3. The units<br />
<strong>for</strong> the abscissa of Figure 2.3 are:<br />
1st line — T number (unitless) corresponding to the<br />
Dvorak scale;<br />
2nd line — mean 10 minutes wind (km/h);<br />
3rd line — sustained 1 minute wind (km/h);<br />
4th line —<br />
5th line —<br />
gusts (km/h);<br />
central pressure measured in units of hectopascal<br />
(hPa).<br />
Perhaps the most important features to be considered<br />
during cyclone watch are the direction and speed of movement.<br />
These are also the most difficult features to obtain as<br />
no specific method of estimating them has been shown to<br />
be perfect, even in the global weather model run at World<br />
Meteorological Centres. This is probably due to a lack of<br />
data at all levels in the oceans. Some of the methods used or<br />
tried are briefly mentioned in the following.<br />
Rules of thumb <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecasting movement using satellite<br />
imagery indicate that, when deep convective cloud clusters<br />
(CCC) develop around the cloud system centre (CSC), which<br />
itself is located at the centre of the eye, then the cyclone is<br />
believed to move towards these CCCs. Elongation of the<br />
cyclone cloud system or the extension of the cirrus shield are<br />
also indications of direction of cyclone movement. Some of<br />
the other methods used by different national Meteorological<br />
Services (NMSs) are: persistence and climatology method;<br />
statistical-dynamic method; dynamic-space mean method;<br />
fixed and variable control-point method; analog method; and<br />
global prediction model. These methods are extensively dealt<br />
with in WMO (1987) Report No. TCP-23.<br />
For the prediction of intensity and wind distribution, a<br />
reconnaissance analysis is conducted in addition to surface<br />
and satellite in<strong>for</strong>mation. In several cases, real strengths of<br />
tropical storms could not possibly be gauged <strong>for</strong> several reasons.<br />
The obvious reason is that no direct measurement of<br />
central pressure or maximum wind speed can be made as<br />
the storms evolve mostly over oceans where surface observations<br />
are inadequate. Secondly, cases have been reported<br />
when anemometers gave way after having measured the<br />
highest gust. In Mauritius, <strong>for</strong> example, the highest ever<br />
recorded gust was on the order of 280 km/h during the passage<br />
of tropical storm Gervaise in February 1975. After this,<br />
the anemometer gave way.<br />
2.4.2 Statistical methods<br />
For the providers of storm and other meteorological hazard<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation and appropriate warning, efficient and judicious<br />
use of tried and tested tools is important. The primary<br />
tool in risk analysis and assessment is the application of the<br />
concept of probability. This permits the compilation of the<br />
consequences of various actions in view of the possible outcomes.<br />
If the probability of each possible outcome can be<br />
estimated, then an optimum action can be found that minimizes<br />
the otherwise expected loss. Furthermore, risk<br />
assessment of secondary effects of the hazards previously<br />
described, besides being used <strong>for</strong> operational hazard <strong>for</strong>ecasting,<br />
can also be useful <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>ming the public of the<br />
risks involved in developing certain areas and <strong>for</strong> long-term<br />
land-use planning purposes.<br />
It is, there<strong>for</strong>e, important to analyse past data of the<br />
magnitude and occurrence of all the hazards and their constituents.<br />
One of the simplest statistical parameters utilized<br />
in meteorology is the return period, Tr. This is defined as the<br />
average number of years within which a given event of a certain<br />
magnitude is expected to be equalled or exceeded. The<br />
event that can be expected to occur, on an average, once<br />
every N years is the N-year event. The concepts of return<br />
period and N-year event contain no implication that an<br />
event of any given magnitude will occur at constant, or even<br />
approximately constant, intervals of N-years. Both terms