U.S. Poverty Thresholds <strong>and</strong> Related Statistics Poverty Thresholds in 2000, 2002, by by size of of family <strong>and</strong> number of of related children under under age 18years Related children under age 18 Eight Size of family unit None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven or more One person Under age 65 $9,359 Age 65 <strong>and</strong> over 8,628 Two people Householder under age 65 12,047 $12,400 Householder age 65 <strong>and</strong> over 10,874 12,353 Three people 14,072 14,480 $14,494 Four people 18,556 18,859 18,244 $18,307 Five people 22,377 22,703 22,007 21,469 $21,141 Six people 25,738 25,840 25,307 24,797 24,038 $23,588 Seven people 29,615 29,799 29,162 28,718 27,890 26,924 $25,865 Eight people 33,121 33,414 32,812 32,285 31,538 30,589 29,601 $29,350 Nine people or more 39,843 40,036 39,504 39,057 38,323 37,313 36,399 36,173 $34,780 Source: U.S Census Bureau, February 2003. Poverty rate by region, 2001 West 12.1% Midwest 9.4% 22.9% Northeast 10.7% 27.1% 10.7% South 13.5% Source: U.S Census Bureau. 102 Family Economics <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nutrition</strong> Review
2003 Vol. 15 No. 1 103
- Page 1 and 2:
Research Articles Special Issue Eld
- Page 3 and 4:
CENTER FOR NUTRITION POLICY AND PRO
- Page 5 and 6:
Research Articles Improving Calcium
- Page 7 and 8:
fiber, niacin, and vitamin C than d
- Page 9 and 10:
Researchers completed and compiled
- Page 11 and 12:
greens were a good source of dietar
- Page 13 and 14:
Marketing and education strategies
- Page 15 and 16:
Jackson, K.A., & Savaiano, D.A. (20
- Page 17 and 18:
The Influence of the Healthy Eating
- Page 19 and 20:
Box 1 - Basic definitions of the St
- Page 21 and 22:
Treatment and Analysis The HELP was
- Page 23 and 24:
Table 2. Pre-test and post-test com
- Page 25 and 26:
References American Dietetic Associ
- Page 27 and 28:
Using a Concurrent Events Approach
- Page 29 and 30:
her daughter and husband, who died
- Page 31 and 32:
money started to become depleted be
- Page 33 and 34:
References Administration on Aging,
- Page 35 and 36:
Measuring the Food Security of Elde
- Page 37 and 38:
Scaling Analysis: Do the Elderly an
- Page 39 and 40:
that of the item and affirmations o
- Page 41 and 42:
food sufficiency question (3.9 perc
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 1. Comparison of item severi
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 3. Other food problems report
- Page 47 and 48:
References Andrews, M., Nord, M., B
- Page 49 and 50:
A Statewide Educational Interventio
- Page 51 and 52:
the Georgia Division of Aging Servi
- Page 53 and 54: Table 2. Fruit and vegetable intake
- Page 55 and 56: Many of the participants’ perform
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4. Physical activity, knowled
- Page 59 and 60: Hackman, R.M., & Wagner, E.L. (1990
- Page 61 and 62: these cognitive demands (Buzzard &
- Page 63 and 64: Phase II In this phase, 90 differen
- Page 65 and 66: Figure. 1. Distributions 1 of perce
- Page 67 and 68: This research did not, however, inv
- Page 69 and 70: Healthy Eating Index Scores and the
- Page 71 and 72: epresentative, contains information
- Page 73 and 74: Table 3. Diet rating of the Healthy
- Page 75 and 76: average educational attainment and
- Page 77 and 78: increasing portion of the budget mu
- Page 79 and 80: women often continue working past a
- Page 81 and 82: Table 3. Diet and disease restricti
- Page 83 and 84: In 1994, Midwest consumers faced fo
- Page 85 and 86: Reduction in Modifiable Osteoporosi
- Page 87 and 88: Baseline At baseline, heel BMD, wei
- Page 89 and 90: Table 2. Baseline and post-interven
- Page 91 and 92: Table 4. Ethnic differences between
- Page 93 and 94: Katzman, R., Brown, R., Fuld, P., P
- Page 95 and 96: More older men than older women lik
- Page 97 and 98: Schools offer a mix of foods in add
- Page 99 and 100: More families own stock Families ma
- Page 101 and 102: Expenditures vary by age Expenses o
- Page 103: Consumer Prices Consumer Consumer P
- Page 107: Guidelines for Submissions to Famil