Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix K. Bioassessment results from sites assessed in the Black Warrior and Cahaba River basins during ADEM's 2002 NPS Basinwide Screening Assessment. CU Locust Fork U. Black Warrior R. L. Black Warrior River Sub-watershed 080 080 080 090 100 030 110 120 120 120 140 150 150 Station SUGB-13 WHTB-12 DAVT-27c NORF-28c BINT-31f BSAT-59b MING-41a BBRH-42a BBRH-42f BBRH-42g NHC-2 HINH-43a a HINH-43a Subecoregion 68d 68e 68f 65i 68f 65i 65i 65i 65i 65i 65a 65p 65p Macroinvertebrate community Date (yymmdd) 020528 020528 020604 020528 020604 020515 020507 020507 020507 020507 020508 020701 # EPT families 14 8 5 10 6 10 7 4 7 2 5 Assessment Excellent Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Fair Poor Fair Poor Good Fish community Date (yymmdd) 020718 020619 020715 020715 Richness measures # species 17 21 15 22 # darter species 3 3 3 3 Appendix K--Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 6 # minnow species 5 8 5 8 # sunfish species 4 4 3 4 # sucker species 3 2 1 2 # intolerant species 1 3 3 4 Composition measures % sunfish 31 10 5 11 % omnivores and herbivores 42 34 37 6 Population measures % insectivorous cyprinids 15 39 11 52 % top carnivores 1 0 2 5 # collected per hour 286 504 184 194 % disease and anomalies 0 0 0 0 IBI score 42 48 40 48 Assessment Fair Good Fair Good a. No flow; Assessment not conducted b. Canopy cover: S=shaded; MS=mostly shaded; 50/50=50% shaded; MO=mostly open; O=open c. Habitat assessment form: RR=riffle/run (Barbour et al. 1999); GP=glide/pool (Barbour et al. 1999) d. Assessment guidelines based on data collected at reference sites, 1991-2003; NG=no assessment guidelines e. Bridge construction; No assessment conducted f. Algal mats/Decaying algae g. Beaverdam; No flow; Assessment not conducted h. physical/chemical data collected in conjunction with ADEM's §303(d) Monitoring Program
Appendix K. Bioassessment results from sites assessed during ADEM's 2002 NPS Basinwide Screening Assessment. L. Black Warrior R. Sub-watershed 160 160 160 160 170 170 190 Station BPRH-44a e BPRH-44b BPRH-44d COTH-57c BGEH-46a LPRH-45b YELH-3c Subecoregion 65a 65a 65a 65a 65a 65a 65a Macroinvertebrate community Date (yymmdd) 020508 020508 020508 020508 020508 020508 # EPT families 7 0 6 5 6 Assessment Good Poor Good Fair Good Fish community Date (yymmdd) 020712 020712 Richness measures # species 15 19 # darter species 2 2 Appendix K--Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 6 # minnow species 3 8 # sunfish species 3 4 # sucker species 1 0 # intolerant species 1 1 Composition measures % sunfish 26 44 % omnivores and herbivores 30 9 Population measures % insectivorous cyprinids 16 37 % top carnivores 3 2 # collected per hour 78 279 % disease and anomalies 0 0 IBI score 32 40 Assessment Poor Fair a. No flow; Assessment not conducted b. Canopy cover: S=shaded; MS=mostly shaded; 50/50=50% shaded; MO=mostly open; O=open c. Habitat assessment form: RR=riffle/run (Barbour et al. 1999); GP=glide/pool (Barbour et al. 1999) d. Assessment guidelines based on data collected at reference sites, 1991-2003; NG=no assessment guidelines e. Bridge construction; No assessment conducted f. Algal mats/Decaying algae g. Beaverdam; No flow; Assessment not conducted h. physical/chemical data collected in conjunction with ADEM's §303(d) Monitoring Program
Page 1 and 2:
SURFACE WATER QUALITY SCREENING ASS
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures LIST OF FIGURES 1 C
Page 7 and 8:
List of Abbreviations LIST OF ABBRE
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction INTRODUCTION Backgroun
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction document includes a de
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction Table 1, cont. List of
Page 15 and 16:
Methodology Table 7. Sub-watersheds
Page 17 and 18:
Methodology Fig. 1. Cataloging unit
Page 19 and 20:
Methodology Fig. 2. Level IV Ecoreg
Page 21 and 22:
Methodology The southern section of
Page 23 and 24:
Methodology The Southern Table Plat
Page 25 and 26:
Methodology Table 8. Current conver
Page 27 and 28:
Methodology SITE SELECTION Alabama
Page 29 and 30:
Methodology Process samples in the
Page 31 and 32:
Methodology Water quality samples a
Page 33 and 34:
Summary: BWC River Basins Summary:
Page 35 and 36:
Summary: BWC River Basins Fig. 3. C
Page 37 and 38:
Summary: BWC River Basins Fig. 4. E
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Summary: BWC River Basins Fig. 10.
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Summary: BWC River Basins Results o
Page 59 and 60:
Summary: BWC River Basins Impaired
Page 61 and 62:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 53
Page 63 and 64:
Summary: BWC River Basins Table 5,
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) Cahaba Riv
Page 69 and 70:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) Types of a
Page 71 and 72:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) Fig. 15. I
Page 73 and 74:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) Sub-Waters
Page 75 and 76:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) suspended
Page 77 and 78:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) indicating
Page 79 and 80:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) assessed a
Page 81 and 82:
Cahaba River (0315-0202) Assessment
Page 83 and 84:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Program (
Page 85 and 86:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Fig. 16.
Page 87 and 88:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) List of i
Page 89 and 90:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Assessmen
Page 91 and 92:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) greater t
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Eightmile
Page 99 and 100:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Broglen R
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Sub-Water
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0109) Bunkum Cr
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0110) Sipsey Fo
Page 121 and 122:
Mulberry Fork (0316-0110) waters. A
Page 123 and 124:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) Fig. 17. 20
Page 125 and 126:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) Sub-Watersh
Page 127 and 128:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) and GSA (Ap
Page 129 and 130:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) Assessment
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) unstable ba
Page 141 and 142:
Sipsey Fork (0316-0110) conditions
Page 143 and 144:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) Historical
Page 145 and 146:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) Fig. 18. 20
Page 147 and 148:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) Upper Locus
Page 149 and 150:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) ADEM 1999a)
Page 151 and 152:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) and fair/po
Page 153 and 154:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) bottom subs
Page 155 and 156:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) Assessment
Page 157 and 158:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) oxygen. ADE
Page 159 and 160:
Locust Fork (0316-0111) Longs Branc
Page 161 and 162:
Upper Black Warrior River (0316-011
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Lower Black Warrior River (0316-011
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
References ACES. 1997. Soil areas o
Page 201 and 202:
References ADEM. 2002b. Nonpoint so
Page 203 and 204:
References APHA, AWWA, and WEF. 199
Page 205 and 206:
References Omernik, J.M. 1996. Leve
Page 207 and 208:
APPENDICES
Page 209 and 210:
Appendix A, cont. Land use percenta
Page 211 and 212:
Appendix B--Page 1 of 3 Appendix B.
Page 213 and 214:
Appendix B--Page 3 of 3 Appendix B,
Page 215 and 216:
Appendix C-2. List of waterbodies w
Page 217 and 218:
Appendix C-2, cont. List of waterbo
Page 219 and 220:
Appendix D, cont. Estimates of (H)i
Page 221 and 222:
Appendix D cont. Estimates of (H)ig
Page 223 and 224:
Appendix E. Stations assessed in th
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248: Appendix E. Stations assessed in th
Page 263 and 264: Appendix F--Page 2 of 2 Appendix F,
Page 265 and 266: Appendix G, cont. Summary of assess
Page 271 and 272: Appendix H, cont. Estimates of anim
Page 279 and 280: Appendix I. Sedimentation estimates
Page 281 and 282: Appendix I, cont. Sedimentation est
Page 289 and 290: Appendix J, cont. Physical characte
Page 295 and 296: Appendix K. Bioassessment results f
Page 297: Appendix K. Bioassessment results f
Page 301 and 302: Appendix L-2. ADEM Glide/Pool habit
Page 303 and 304: ADEM — FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION
Page 305 and 306: Appendix M--Page 2 of 3 Appendix M.
Page 307 and 308: Appendix N. Concentration of metals
Page 309 and 310: Appendix O-1. Physical characterist
Page 315 and 316: Appendix O-3. Physical/chemical dat
Page 317 and 318: Appendix O-3--Page 3 of 4 Appendix
Page 319 and 320: Appendix P. §303(d) Waterbody Moni
Page 321 and 322: Appendix P-1. Physical characterist
Page 327 and 328: Appendix P-2. Bioassessment results
Page 329 and 330: Appendix P-3. Physical/chemical dat
Page 349 and 350:
Appendix P-3. Physical/chemical dat
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Appendix Q. Periphyton Bioassessmen
Page 357 and 358:
Appendix Q--Page 2 of 2 Appendix Q.
Page 359 and 360:
Appendix R--Page 1 of 5 Appendix R.
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Appendix S--Page 1 of 9 Appendix S.
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Appendix S. Physical/chemical data
Page 375 and 376:
Appendix T-1. Results of habitat as
Page 377 and 378:
Appendix T-1. Results of habitat as
Page 379:
Appendix T-2--Page 1 of 1 Appendix
show all

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?