14.11.2014 Views

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary: BWC River Basins<br />

The main NPS concerns within the Sipsey Fork CU were pasture, animal husbandry,<br />

mining, and forestry. NPS concerns within the U. Black Warrior R. CU were limited to<br />

sedimentation, mining, and forestry. Aquaculture was concentrated in the Blackbelt region<br />

<strong>of</strong> the L. Black Warrior R. (Fig. 11).<br />

Over 40% <strong>of</strong> the sub-watersheds in the Cahaba River, Mulberry Fork, and Locust Fork<br />

CUs were at risk to impairment from urban and point sources (Table 3, Fig. 12).<br />

Table 2. Number <strong>of</strong> sub-watersheds with moderate or high ratings for each NPS category<br />

Overall<br />

Potential<br />

Animal<br />

husbandry<br />

Cataloging Unit Total #<br />

subwatersheds<br />

Aquaculture<br />

Row<br />

crop<br />

Pasture Mining Forestry Sediment<br />

Impaired<br />

(Reported)<br />

Cahaba River 17 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 (9) 8<br />

Mulberry Fork 20 13 10 0 7 10 8 15 (17) 15<br />

Sipsey Fork 13 4 6 0 1 7 4 4 (9) 1<br />

Locust Fork 15 5 4 0 9 9 4 5 (15) 6<br />

U. Black Warrior R. 12 4 0 0 0 0 6 4 (5) 9<br />

L. Black Warrior R. 19 4 0 6 9 7 0 4 (17) 3<br />

Table 3. Number <strong>of</strong> sub-watersheds with moderate or high ratings for each point source<br />

or urban category<br />

Category<br />

Total # subwatersheds<br />

Overall<br />

Potential<br />

% Urban Development Septic tank<br />

failure<br />

Cahaba River 17 7 8 7 5<br />

Mulberry Fork 20 9 5 5 11<br />

Sipsey Fork 13 2 1 1 5<br />

Locust Fork 15 7 8 6 7<br />

U. Black Warrior R. 12 3 4 4 1<br />

L. Black Warrior R. 19 5 7 3 3<br />

Historical data/studies: The Black Warrior and Cahaba River Basins are among the most<br />

well-studied river basins in <strong>Alabama</strong> (Fig. 13). Twenty-two water quality assessment<br />

projects and programs have been conducted since 1998 by ADEM, the U.S. <strong>Environmental</strong><br />

Protection Agency (USEPA), the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alabama</strong> (GSA), U.S. Geological<br />

Survey (USGS), University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alabama</strong> (UA and UAB), Jefferson County, and Samford<br />

University (SU).<br />

Data from these projects and programs include both monitored and evaluated<br />

assessments. Monitored assessments are based on chemical, physical, and/or biological<br />

data collected using commonly accepted and well-documented methods. Evaluated<br />

assessments are based on observed conditions, limited water quality data, water quality<br />

data older than 5 years, or estimated impacts from observed or suspected activities.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!