14.11.2014 Views

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix P-1. Physical characteristics and habitat quality <strong>of</strong> sites assessed in the Black Warrior and Cahaba River basins as part <strong>of</strong> ADEM's §303(d)<br />

Monitoring Program, 1998-2003.<br />

CU 0112 0112 0112 0112 0112 0112 0112 0112 0112 0113<br />

Sub-watershed 030 030 050 050 050 070 080 080 100 140<br />

Station MUDJ-2 VA1 BYET-65a LYC-1 LYCT-1 JKC-1 DNC-1 PGC-1 NORF-28c NHC-2<br />

Appendix P-1--Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

Date (YYMMDD)<br />

Subecoregion<br />

Width (ft)<br />

020523 020523 020417 f 990616 020417 990616 990622 990622 020528 000210<br />

68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 65a<br />

30 96 30 30 15 25 15 30 12<br />

Canopy cover b S ? MS MO MO S 50/50 50/50 MO 50/50<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Substrate (%)<br />

Riffle<br />

Run<br />

Pool<br />

Bedrock<br />

Boulder<br />

Cobble<br />

Gravel<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Detritus<br />

Clay<br />

Organic silt<br />

0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3<br />

1.5 1.0 4.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 2.0 1.0<br />

2.8 5.0 2.0 1.8 1.0 3.5 3.0<br />

40 60 78 80 5 0 0 60 0<br />

10 15 1 0 3 5 1 5 0<br />

10 10 3 0 25 10 25 5 0<br />

10 5 0 5 56 60 66 10 2<br />

18 5 5 10 5 3 1 15 29<br />

5 3 10 0 3 20 5 2 22<br />

4 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 4<br />

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40<br />

0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3<br />

Habitat assessment form c, d RR RR GP RR RR RR RR RR GP<br />

Habitat assessment score<br />

% Maximum<br />

Instream habitat quality<br />

Sediment deposition<br />

Sinuosity<br />

Bank and vegetative stability<br />

Riparian measurements<br />

65 76 10 15 78 57 65 63 15<br />

74 80 53 26 90 38 60 64 75<br />

75 85 30 33 100 25 95 63 40<br />

83 90 70 36 60 43 83 33 20<br />

95 91 23 48 73 85 88 90 30<br />

189 203 88 73 189 131 176 156 73<br />

79 85 40 30 79 55 73 65 33<br />

Assessment e Excellent Excellent Fair Poor Excellent Good Excellent Good Poor<br />

a. No flow; Assessment not conducted<br />

b. Canopy cover: S=shaded; MS=mostly shaded; 50/50=50% shaded; MO=mostly open; O=open<br />

c. Habitat assessment form: RR=riffle/run (Barbour et al. 1999); GP=glide/pool (Barbour et al. 1999)<br />

d. e. NG=assessment NGP=no glide/pool guidelines; assessment for 68b, guidelines; used guidelines habitat assessment from adjacent ratingsubecoregion based on riffle/run 68d; limited scoring reference criteria data available for 68f; 68f guidelines calculated from combintion <strong>of</strong> reference data from<br />

68f, and adjacent subecoregions 65i, 67f, and 68e.<br />

f. nonwadeable; no habitat assessment conducted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!