14.11.2014 Views

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Surface Water - Alabama Department of Environmental Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix P-1. Physical characteristics and habitat quality <strong>of</strong> sites assessed in the Black Warrior and Cahaba River basins as part <strong>of</strong> ADEM's §303(d) Monitoring Program, 1998-2003.<br />

CU 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111 0111<br />

Sub-watershed 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 150 150<br />

Station CMBJ-2 CMBJ-3 CMBJ-3 CMBJ-3 CMBJ-4 CMBJ-4 CMBJ-4 VLGJ-1 VLGJ-1 VLGJ-2 VLGJ-2 VLGJ-4 VLGJ-4 LFKB-2 SHTJ-1<br />

Appendix P-1--Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

Date (YYMMDD)<br />

Subecoregion<br />

Width (ft)<br />

020528 a 020612 020313 020528 020612 020313 020528 020522 020715 020522 020715 f 020522 020715 020702 020515<br />

68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 68f NG 67f 67f 67f 67f 67f 68f NG 68e 68f NG<br />

6 10 6 12 12 5 25 20 35 30 60 50 110 20<br />

Canopy cover b O 50/50 50/50 S O MO O O MO O 50/50 O O O MS<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Substrate (%)<br />

Riffle<br />

Run<br />

Pool<br />

Bedrock<br />

Boulder<br />

Cobble<br />

Gravel<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Detritus<br />

Clay<br />

Organic silt<br />

0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2<br />

0.4 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.8 1.5 3.0 1.5 0.6 4.0 0.5<br />

0.7 1.5 2.0 1.5 6.0 2.0 5.0 1.5<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 50 5 0 0 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 15 25 5 20 0 0 5 40<br />

0 0 5 0 0 35 20 30 45 20 10 5 30 30<br />

2 0 5 45 45 25 35 30 35 5 68 50 30 15<br />

45 80 60 50 45 22 25 15 5 5 10 40 24 10<br />

45 0 20 5 0 5 4 0 3 0 5 5 5 3<br />

8 20 5 0 10 3 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 0<br />

0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Habitat assessment form c, d GP GP RR GP GP RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR<br />

Habitat assessment score<br />

% Maximum<br />

Instream habitat quality<br />

Sediment deposition<br />

Sinuosity<br />

Bank and vegetative stability<br />

Riparian measurements<br />

34 71 38 61 72 73 71 77 73 71 25 81 67<br />

73 78 43 70 63 56 76 45 71 69 49 66 78<br />

50 68 55 60 60 65 83 98 55 55 70 48 100<br />

65 85 53 90 80 66 76 93 61 83 73 78 81<br />

100 90 88 63 61 69 51 53 25 56 89 93 100<br />

133 175 138 148 152 163 173 178 134 160 142 189 199<br />

60 80 58 67 69 68 72 74 56 67 59 79 83<br />

Assessment e Good Excellent Good Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Good Good Excellent Excellent<br />

a. No flow; Assessment not conducted<br />

b. Canopy cover: S=shaded; MS=mostly shaded; 50/50=50% shaded; MO=mostly open; O=open<br />

c. Habitat assessment form: RR=riffle/run (Barbour et al. 1999); GP=glide/pool (Barbour et al. 1999)<br />

d. NGP=no glide/pool assessment guidelines; habitat assessment rating based on riffle/run scoring criteria<br />

e. NG=assessment guidelines; for 68b, used guidelines from adjacent subecoregion 68d; limited reference data available for 68f; 68f guidelines calculated from combintion <strong>of</strong> reference data from 68f, and adjacent subecoregions 65i, 67f, and 68e.<br />

f. nonwadeable; no habitat assessment conducted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!