14.11.2014 Views

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Palestinian Rights and Israeli Wrongs<br />

David Matas*<br />

Rights are claimed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Palestinian people and wrongs where nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> rights nor <strong>the</strong> wrongs exist. Specifically, whole new categories <strong>of</strong><br />

rights and wrongs are developed that only Israel has to respect; wrongs<br />

are created that only Israel inflicts. A discussion follows on <strong>the</strong> nature<br />

and extent <strong>of</strong> antisemitism.<br />

Key Words: Arab, Israel, Jewish, Law, Palestinian<br />

A. THE PATTERN<br />

There is a troubling pattern <strong>of</strong> claimed Palestinian rights and Jewish<br />

wrongs where nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> rights nor <strong>the</strong> wrongs exist. Is it fair and accurate<br />

to describe this phenomenon as antisemitic?<br />

Internationally recognized human rights belong to everyone by virtue<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y are human. Internationally recognized human rights do<br />

not just belong to Palestinians or Jews or Canadians or any o<strong>the</strong>r particular<br />

national group. The very assertion <strong>of</strong> Palestinian rights is an assertion <strong>of</strong><br />

exceptionalism, not universality.<br />

The same is true <strong>of</strong> wrongs. A violation <strong>of</strong> human rights remains a<br />

violation whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> victims are Jews or Palestinians or Canadians or any<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r particular national group. A claim that an act affecting Palestinians is<br />

wrong where <strong>the</strong>re is no claim <strong>of</strong> wrong <strong>for</strong> a similar act affecting o<strong>the</strong>rs is<br />

also an assertion <strong>of</strong> exceptionalism.<br />

<strong>No</strong> one person can do everything. There is a value <strong>of</strong> specialization in<br />

human rights as much as in any o<strong>the</strong>r area <strong>of</strong> human endeavor. There is a<br />

difference, however, between specialization—asserting a general right <strong>for</strong><br />

one group and leaving to o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>the</strong> assertion <strong>of</strong> that right <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r groups<br />

or combating a general wrong inflicted on one group and leaving to o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

<strong>the</strong> combating <strong>of</strong> that wrong inflicted on o<strong>the</strong>r groups—and exceptionalism—asserting<br />

a right that exists only <strong>for</strong> that group or claiming as wrongful<br />

treatment only when it affects one group in particular.<br />

B. UNREAL RIGHTS<br />

There is a whole litany <strong>of</strong> rights that are claimed only <strong>for</strong> Palestinians<br />

and no one else. These claimed rights are not really rights at all.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!