14.11.2014 Views

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bistro <strong>Antisemitism</strong>: From Bierkeller to Soiree<br />

Ben Cohen*<br />

Examining <strong>the</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> modern antisemitism in Germany following <strong>the</strong><br />

Franco-Prussian war <strong>of</strong> 1870, <strong>the</strong> Swedish historian Hugo Valentin identified<br />

perhaps <strong>the</strong> central <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> anti-Jewish agitation in <strong>the</strong> fin-de-siecle<br />

period. “As <strong>the</strong> Jews were scattered over <strong>the</strong> whole world, <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

regarded as an ‘International,’ ” Valentin explained, “and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e as enemies<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national State.”<br />

Valentin published his book <strong>Antisemitism</strong> in 1935—<strong>the</strong> same year that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Nazi regime confirmed <strong>the</strong> inferior civil status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> un-German, alien<br />

Jewish minority through <strong>the</strong> Nuremburg Laws. Were Valentin writing<br />

today, it is likely that his assessment would be radically revised, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

crime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jews in <strong>the</strong> post-Holocaust era is not internationalism, but tribalism.<br />

Ra<strong>the</strong>r than diluting <strong>the</strong> national character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> societies in which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y live, Jews are regarded by <strong>the</strong>ir adversaries as guilty <strong>of</strong> subverting <strong>the</strong><br />

l<strong>of</strong>ty goals <strong>of</strong> international peace and justice through <strong>the</strong> aggressive pursuit<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own national project. Hence, one might say that antisemitism today<br />

is no longer a <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> racism so much as it is a <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> anti-racism or anticolonialism.<br />

How has this trans<strong>for</strong>mation come about? To answer this question, we<br />

need to understand that while antisemitism is, <strong>for</strong> Jews, a murderous type <strong>of</strong><br />

prejudice that shares common characteristics with o<strong>the</strong>r racisms, <strong>for</strong><br />

antisemites <strong>the</strong>mselves it is primarily a means <strong>for</strong> explaining <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

This disparity in perception is important: too <strong>of</strong>ten, contemporary debates<br />

concerning <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> antisemitism revolve around whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> individual<br />

so accused is personally ill disposed toward Jews. Invariably, such individuals<br />

respond with an indignant denial. Even Rudolf Hoess, <strong>the</strong> notorious<br />

commandant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Auschwitz concentration camp, declared in his memoir<br />

that, on a personal level, he didn’t dislike Jews; his fealty to <strong>the</strong> antisemitic<br />

worldview, grounded on what he saw as its scientifically rigorous explana-<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!