14.11.2014 Views

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF ANTISEMITISM [ VOL. 4:221<br />

As is well known and needs no retelling, Jews flocked to <strong>the</strong> American<br />

armed <strong>for</strong>ces following America’s entry into <strong>the</strong> Second World War after<br />

<strong>the</strong> Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. As <strong>the</strong> revelations<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holocaust/Shoah became increasingly public, Jews worked tirelessly,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten behind <strong>the</strong> scenes, to come to <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fellow Jews. Yet<br />

those ef<strong>for</strong>ts were hampered by <strong>the</strong> delicate balancing act <strong>of</strong> a very public<br />

antisemitism during <strong>the</strong> Second World War itself—not wanting to give <strong>the</strong><br />

American public, including its isolationists, excuses to hamper <strong>the</strong> war<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t by attempting to convince President Roosevelt that it was a “Jewish<br />

war.” 19 Again, J. J. Goldberg:<br />

But to say that most Americans were against saving Jews in 1939 or 1944<br />

is to understate <strong>the</strong> problem. Opposition to helping Jews was not merely<br />

widespread, it was intense. A sizable faction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American political<br />

scene was so set against helping Jews that it was willing to pay a price,<br />

even inhibit <strong>the</strong> war ef<strong>for</strong>t, in order to avoid helping Jews. . . .<br />

Similarly, <strong>the</strong> obstructionist activities <strong>of</strong> administration <strong>of</strong>ficials—<br />

from U.S. consuls abroad who blocked Jewish visas, right up to <strong>the</strong> assistant<br />

secretary <strong>of</strong> state in charge <strong>of</strong> refugee affairs, Breckenridge<br />

Long 20 —are frequently cited by revisionists as evidence that Roosevelt<br />

was apa<strong>the</strong>tic or hostile toward saving Jewish lives. The argument is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> president should have fired such administrators.<br />

But in America in 1942, hostility toward Jews was not grounds <strong>for</strong><br />

firing a public <strong>of</strong>ficial. . . .<br />

In one important sense, <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> Jews in America at that time<br />

was so dismal that it is now difficult to recapture. Anti-Jewish hostility<br />

was so widespread, and so respectable, that even a president who was<br />

sympa<strong>the</strong>tic toward Jews had to weigh <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>midable risks <strong>of</strong> helping<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. 21<br />

And thus, it was only after <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second World War<br />

and <strong>the</strong> increasing public revelations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shoah—as Kaplan, Goldberg,<br />

and countless o<strong>the</strong>rs have written—that <strong>the</strong> antisemitism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s,<br />

1930s, and 1940s seriously began to erode and dissipate. Throughout <strong>the</strong>se<br />

three decades, <strong>the</strong> U.S. State Department charged with administering<br />

19. Today, ironically, Israel’s enemies continue to argue that America’s takedown<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dictatorial regime <strong>of</strong> Iraqi Saddam Hussein was manipulated by Jewish<br />

neocons—i.e., Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Lewis “Scooter”<br />

Libby, David Frum, Dov Zakheim, Elliot Abrams, and Joshua Bolten—in response<br />

to Israel’s political agenda to remove a potential nuclear threat to its viability.<br />

20. For one such assessment, see Steven Leonard Jacobs, “Breckenridge Long<br />

and Coming to America,” <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Antisemitism</strong> 2, no. 2 (2010):<br />

115-132.<br />

21. J. J. Goldberg, Jewish Power, 115-116.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!