Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism
Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism
Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
338 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF ANTISEMITISM [ VOL. 4:337<br />
world-class contemporary Talmud Department. For example, during a<br />
cocktail party toward <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> film, two scholars joke at each<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r with a mocking discussion <strong>of</strong> Daniel Boyarin’s book Unheroic Conduct:<br />
The Rise <strong>of</strong> Heterosexuality and <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish Man.<br />
Boyarin’s notions, while certainly not without <strong>the</strong>ir merits, are more<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> Footnote’s popularizing—“dumbing-down type,” if you<br />
will—<strong>the</strong> Talmudic scholar character, Uriel Shkolnik (Lior Ashkenazi),<br />
than <strong>of</strong> his classically rigorous scholar-fa<strong>the</strong>r Eliezer Shkolnik (Shlomo Bar<br />
Aba)—shkolnik being a Russian word <strong>for</strong> student. Shkolnik père is palpably<br />
embittered that his most cherished student, Shkolnik fils, rebelled<br />
against <strong>the</strong> critical lesson <strong>of</strong> scholarship qua scholarship—whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it<br />
is applied to <strong>the</strong>ological disciplines)—namely, that it should be considered<br />
as though it were like an inviolable religion unto itself.<br />
Uriel is a glad-hander, a people person—and people have rewarded<br />
him with popular success. Eliezer, by contrast, has alienated himself from,<br />
and been alienated by, o<strong>the</strong>rs, because—though he adheres to <strong>the</strong> strictures<br />
<strong>of</strong> his academic discipline with unimpeachable integrity—his Sisyphean<br />
labors have never earned him any significant recognition. The despicable<br />
character that pays most attention to Eliezer’s pr<strong>of</strong>essional activities,<br />
department head Yehuda Grossman (Micah Lewensohn), views and treats<br />
him with sadistic disdain.<br />
Through <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> his <strong>for</strong>midable, hateful will, Grossman sets Footnote’s<br />
plot in motion by getting <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize committee to award <strong>the</strong><br />
Israel Prize to Uriel. In reality, <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize is awarded to a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
figures and organizations, but truly never in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> Talmudic studies to<br />
a popularizer like Uriel. For example, <strong>the</strong> towering man <strong>of</strong> Hebrew letters,<br />
Yehuda Even-Shmuel, won <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize in 1973. In 2000, <strong>the</strong> Prize <strong>for</strong><br />
Talmudic Studies was awarded to Avraham Goldberg, responsible <strong>for</strong> critical<br />
editions <strong>of</strong> Massechtot Oholot and Bava Kamma as well as <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r key<br />
texts. In 2008, David Weiss Halivni was awarded <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize <strong>for</strong> Talmudic<br />
Studies; his seminal source critical analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Talmud caused an<br />
earthquake, and he is noted <strong>for</strong> his <strong>the</strong>ological perspectives on <strong>the</strong> Holocaust,<br />
in which he concludes that God was wholly absent at <strong>the</strong> time (in<br />
marked contrast to <strong>the</strong>ologians who see <strong>the</strong> Holocaust as constituting part <strong>of</strong><br />
a divine plan).<br />
Grossman had schemed to award <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize to Uriel only to spite<br />
Eliezer, whom he knew suffered absurdist delusions that he might one day<br />
win this ultimate Israeli distinction. Grossman’s malevolent depravity is<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r illustrated when he has a committee <strong>of</strong>ficial call Eliezer to tell him<br />
that he has won <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize, but pretend not to notice that she is not<br />
speaking with <strong>the</strong> correct Shkolnik. As a result, Eliezer believes that his just<br />
reward is coming due, whereas Uriel would not be a likely Israel Prize