14.11.2014 Views

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 1 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF ANTISEMITISM [ VOL. 4:337<br />

world-class contemporary Talmud Department. For example, during a<br />

cocktail party toward <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> film, two scholars joke at each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r with a mocking discussion <strong>of</strong> Daniel Boyarin’s book Unheroic Conduct:<br />

The Rise <strong>of</strong> Heterosexuality and <strong>the</strong> Invention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish Man.<br />

Boyarin’s notions, while certainly not without <strong>the</strong>ir merits, are more<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> Footnote’s popularizing—“dumbing-down type,” if you<br />

will—<strong>the</strong> Talmudic scholar character, Uriel Shkolnik (Lior Ashkenazi),<br />

than <strong>of</strong> his classically rigorous scholar-fa<strong>the</strong>r Eliezer Shkolnik (Shlomo Bar<br />

Aba)—shkolnik being a Russian word <strong>for</strong> student. Shkolnik père is palpably<br />

embittered that his most cherished student, Shkolnik fils, rebelled<br />

against <strong>the</strong> critical lesson <strong>of</strong> scholarship qua scholarship—whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it<br />

is applied to <strong>the</strong>ological disciplines)—namely, that it should be considered<br />

as though it were like an inviolable religion unto itself.<br />

Uriel is a glad-hander, a people person—and people have rewarded<br />

him with popular success. Eliezer, by contrast, has alienated himself from,<br />

and been alienated by, o<strong>the</strong>rs, because—though he adheres to <strong>the</strong> strictures<br />

<strong>of</strong> his academic discipline with unimpeachable integrity—his Sisyphean<br />

labors have never earned him any significant recognition. The despicable<br />

character that pays most attention to Eliezer’s pr<strong>of</strong>essional activities,<br />

department head Yehuda Grossman (Micah Lewensohn), views and treats<br />

him with sadistic disdain.<br />

Through <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> his <strong>for</strong>midable, hateful will, Grossman sets Footnote’s<br />

plot in motion by getting <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize committee to award <strong>the</strong><br />

Israel Prize to Uriel. In reality, <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize is awarded to a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

figures and organizations, but truly never in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> Talmudic studies to<br />

a popularizer like Uriel. For example, <strong>the</strong> towering man <strong>of</strong> Hebrew letters,<br />

Yehuda Even-Shmuel, won <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize in 1973. In 2000, <strong>the</strong> Prize <strong>for</strong><br />

Talmudic Studies was awarded to Avraham Goldberg, responsible <strong>for</strong> critical<br />

editions <strong>of</strong> Massechtot Oholot and Bava Kamma as well as <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r key<br />

texts. In 2008, David Weiss Halivni was awarded <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize <strong>for</strong> Talmudic<br />

Studies; his seminal source critical analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Talmud caused an<br />

earthquake, and he is noted <strong>for</strong> his <strong>the</strong>ological perspectives on <strong>the</strong> Holocaust,<br />

in which he concludes that God was wholly absent at <strong>the</strong> time (in<br />

marked contrast to <strong>the</strong>ologians who see <strong>the</strong> Holocaust as constituting part <strong>of</strong><br />

a divine plan).<br />

Grossman had schemed to award <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize to Uriel only to spite<br />

Eliezer, whom he knew suffered absurdist delusions that he might one day<br />

win this ultimate Israeli distinction. Grossman’s malevolent depravity is<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r illustrated when he has a committee <strong>of</strong>ficial call Eliezer to tell him<br />

that he has won <strong>the</strong> Israel Prize, but pretend not to notice that she is not<br />

speaking with <strong>the</strong> correct Shkolnik. As a result, Eliezer believes that his just<br />

reward is coming due, whereas Uriel would not be a likely Israel Prize

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!