Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 | PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 6<br />
also requires States to cooperate with international organisations in<br />
their efforts to protect and assist the child and to trace the child’s parents<br />
or other relatives. 215<br />
In respect of tracking, the use of DNA tracking systems should <strong>no</strong>t<br />
create additional obstacles to family reunification, should require prior<br />
informed consent of the applicant, and should be used only when necessary.<br />
216<br />
Even when the family is identified through tracking, or in any other case<br />
of family reunification, the Committee on the Rights of the Child has<br />
warned that “family reunification in the country of origin is <strong>no</strong>t in the<br />
best interest of the child and should therefore <strong>no</strong>t be pursued where<br />
there is a “reasonable risk” that such a return would lead to the violation<br />
of fundamental human rights of the child. Such risk is indisputably<br />
documented in the granting of refugee status or in a decision of the<br />
competent authorities on the applicability of <strong>no</strong>n-refoulement obligations<br />
[. . .]. Where the circumstances in the country of origin contain<br />
lower level risks and there is concern, for example, of the child being<br />
affected by the indiscriminate effects of generalised violence, such risks<br />
must be given full attention and balanced against other rights-based<br />
considerations, including the consequences of further separation.” 217<br />
i) Discrimination and access to the territory<br />
The situation of unaccompanied mi<strong>no</strong>rs, whether seeking asylum or <strong>no</strong>t,<br />
warrants special consideration, due both to their vulnerability to exploitation<br />
and abuse and to their incapacity to cope with systems and<br />
institutions designed to address adult migration. Under the CRC, children<br />
enjoy particular protection against discrimination. The CRC provides<br />
that children’s rights must be protected without discrimination of<br />
any kind, 218 including discrimination due to their nationality, immigration<br />
status or statelessness. 219 Furthermore, “States Parties shall take<br />
all appropriate measures to ensure that the child is protected against all<br />
forms of discrimination or punishment on the basis of the status, activities,<br />
expressed opinions, or beliefs of the child’s parents, legal guard-<br />
215 Article 23.2 ACRWC.<br />
216 See, Concluding Observations on Denmark, CCPR, UN Doc. CCPR/CO/70/DNK, 15 November<br />
2000, para. 15; Concluding Observations on France, CCPR, op. cit., fn. 188, para. 21.<br />
217 CRC, General Comment No. 6, op. cit., fn. 138, paras. 82–83. The General Comment provides<br />
with even more detailed information on considerations and procedural requirements<br />
towards unaccompanied children.<br />
218 Article 2.1 CRC.<br />
219 See CRC, General Comment No. 6, op. cit., fn. 138, paras. 12, 16 and 18. See also, Office<br />
of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Study on chall<strong>eng</strong>es and best<br />
practices in the implementation of the international framework for the protection of the<br />
rights of the child in the context of migration, UN Doc. A/HRC/15/29, 5 July 2010 (OHCHR<br />
Study), paras. 21–22.