Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW | 245<br />
in the case of unlawfully present persons <strong>no</strong> alternative to accommodation<br />
may be required by States, eviction from shelter should be banned as it<br />
would place the persons concerned, particularly children, in a situation of<br />
extreme helplessness which is contrary to the respect of their human dignity.”<br />
993 The Committee has also further determined that “failure to accommodate<br />
[undocumented] mi<strong>no</strong>rs shows, in particular, that the Government<br />
has <strong>no</strong>t taken the necessary and appropriate measures to guarantee the<br />
mi<strong>no</strong>rs in question the care and assistance they need and to protect them<br />
from negligence, violence or exploitation, thereby posing a serious threat<br />
to the enjoyment of their most basic rights, such as the rights to life, to<br />
psychological and physical integrity and to respect for human dignity,” 994 in<br />
breach of their right to to appropriate social, legal and eco<strong>no</strong>mic protection<br />
under Article 17.1 ESC(r). Furthermore, failure to appropriately accommodate<br />
undocumented children or young persons, whether accompanied or<br />
<strong>no</strong>t by their family, breaches the State’s obligation to take “the necessary<br />
measures to guarantee these mi<strong>no</strong>rs the special protection against physical<br />
and moral hazards required by Article 7, §10, thereby causing a serious<br />
threat to their enjoyment of the most basic rights, such as the right to life,<br />
to psychological and physical integrity and to respect for human dignity.” 995<br />
The European Committee of Social Rights also affirmed that lack of accommodation<br />
for children and young persons leads to violations of their<br />
right to access health services and of the obligation of States to prevent<br />
epidemic and endemic diseases under Article 11 ESC(r). The Committee<br />
has specifically ruled that “the lasting incapacity of the reception facilities<br />
and the fact that, consequently, a number of the mi<strong>no</strong>rs in question<br />
(particularly those accompanied by their families) have been consistently<br />
forced into life on the streets exposes these mi<strong>no</strong>rs to increased threats to<br />
their health and their physical integrity, which are the result in particular<br />
of a lack of housing or foster homes. In this connection, the Committee<br />
considers that providing foreign mi<strong>no</strong>rs with housing and foster homes is<br />
a minimum prerequisite for attempting to remove the causes of ill health<br />
among these mi<strong>no</strong>rs (including epidemic, endemic or other diseases) and<br />
that the State therefore has felt to meet its obligations as far as the<br />
adoption of this minimum prerequisite is concerned.” 996<br />
iii) Protection of the right to housing through civil and political rights<br />
The ECHR affords protection from destruction of homes 997 and forced<br />
evictions 998 under the right to respect for the home and family and<br />
993 Ibid., para. 62.<br />
994 DCI v. Belgium, ECSR, op. cit., fn. 904, para. 82.<br />
995 Ibid., para. 97.<br />
996 Ibid., para. 117.<br />
997 Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 937.<br />
998 Mentes v. Turkey, ECtHR, GC, Application No. 23186/94, Judgment of 28 November 1997.