18.11.2014 Views

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW | 193<br />

on Detention apply equally to “stateless persons who are seeking asylum,<br />

although they do <strong>no</strong>t specifically cover the situation of <strong>no</strong>n-asylum-seeking<br />

stateless persons, persons found <strong>no</strong>t to be in need of international<br />

protection or other migrants, although many of the standards<br />

detailed herein may apply to them mutatis mutandis. This is particularly<br />

true with regard to <strong>no</strong>n-refugee stateless persons in the migratory context<br />

who face a heightened risk of arbitrary detention”. 716<br />

7. Detention of migrants for purposes other than<br />

immigration control<br />

Although the focus of this Chapter is on detention for the purposes of<br />

immigration control, it should be <strong>no</strong>ted that migrants, like others, may<br />

also be detained on other legitimate or illegitimate grounds. While the<br />

majority of human rights treaties do <strong>no</strong>t expressly specify the grounds on<br />

which detention is permitted, under the ECHR, in addition to detention for<br />

the purposes of immigration control, permissible detention is limited to:<br />

• detention following conviction by a criminal court;<br />

• detention for failure to comply with an order of a court or to secure<br />

the fulfilment of an obligation prescribed by law;<br />

• detention following arrest on suspicion of committing an offence<br />

or in order to prevent an offence being committed;<br />

• detention of mi<strong>no</strong>rs for educational purposes;<br />

• detention where strictly necessary for the prevention of the spread<br />

of infectious diseases;<br />

• detention of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics, drug addicts or<br />

vagrants, where necessary for their own protection or the protection<br />

of the public.<br />

All such detentions are subject to safeguards against arbitrariness similar<br />

to those that apply to immigration detention. It should also be <strong>no</strong>ted<br />

that such powers of detention are subject to the principle of <strong>no</strong>n-discrimination,<br />

including on grounds of nationality, and must therefore <strong>no</strong>t<br />

be exclusively or disproportionately imposed on <strong>no</strong>n-nationals except<br />

where the difference in treatment can be objectively and reasonably<br />

justified in the circumstances. 717<br />

a) Administrative detention on grounds of national security<br />

Administrative detention for reasons of national security, although distinct<br />

from detention for the purposes of immigration control, may nevertheless<br />

disproportionately affect <strong>no</strong>n-nationals. Although, under the<br />

716 UNHCR Guidelines on Detention, op. cit., fn. 633, Scope, para. 4.<br />

717 A. and Others v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 691.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!