18.11.2014 Views

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW | 265<br />

to cruel treatment and abuse, control of sexuality and forced<br />

labour”. 1105<br />

Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, enslavement,<br />

when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack<br />

directed against any civilian population, constitutes a crime against humanity.<br />

1106<br />

The European Court of Human Rights has recently held that, for slavery<br />

to exist, there must be the exercise of a genuine right to ownership and<br />

a reduction of the status of the individual concerned to an “object”. It<br />

considers that servitude entails a particularly serious form of denial of<br />

freedom, and an obligation, under coercion, to provide one’s services,<br />

and it is linked with the concept of “slavery”. 1107<br />

2. Forced labour<br />

The prohibition of forced labour was also universally internationally<br />

accepted at an early stage, and it has attained jus cogens status. 1108<br />

Within the ILO system, forced labour is prohibited by the ILO Forced<br />

Labour Convention (No. 29) of 1930, and the ILO Abolition of Forced<br />

Labour Convention (No. 105) of 1957. In international human rights<br />

law, its prohibition is enshrined in major international and regional human<br />

rights treaties as a right <strong>no</strong>t subject to derogation. 1109<br />

a) What is forced labour?<br />

The definition of forced and compulsory labour was established by the<br />

ILO in 1930 as “all work or service which is exacted from any person<br />

under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has<br />

1105 Kunarac et al., ICTY, op. cit., fn. 1102, paras. 117 and 119.<br />

1106 Article 7.1(c), Rome Statute.<br />

1107 Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 236, para. 276. See also, Van Droogenbroeck<br />

v. Belgium, ECtHR, Plenary, Application No. 7906/77, Judgment of 24 June 1982, para. 58.<br />

1108 4 th General Survey on Eradication of Forced Labour, ILO Committee of Experts on the Application<br />

of Conventions and Recommendations, 2007, Document No. (ilolex): 252007G03,<br />

para. 10. The European Court held that the prohibition of slavery, servitude and forced<br />

and compulsory labour “enshrines one of the basic values of the democratic societies<br />

making up the Council of Europe”, Siliadin v. France, ECtHR, Application No. 73316/01,<br />

Judgment of 26 July 2005, paras. 82 and 112; Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, ECtHR,<br />

op. cit., fn. 237, para. 283; Zarb Adami v. Malta, ECtHR, Application No. 17209/02, Judgment<br />

of 20 June 2006, para. 43. The African Commission held that “unremunerated work<br />

is tantamount to a violation of the right to respect for the dignity inherent in the human<br />

being”, Malawi African Association and Others v. Mauritania, ACommHPR, op. cit.,<br />

fn. 1006, 11 May 2000, para. 135.<br />

1109 Article 6.2 ACHR; Article 8.3 ICCPR; Article 11.2, 3 and 4 ICRMW; Article 10.2 ArCHR; Article<br />

4.2-3 ECHR; Article 1.2 ESC(r), according to the interpretation of the European Committee on<br />

Social Rights in International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) v. Greece, ECSR,<br />

Complaint No. 7/2000, Merits, 5 December 2000, paras. 17-18; Article 6 ICESCR (the CESCR<br />

has found that forced labour is a direct violation of Article 6, see, General Comment No. 18,<br />

The Right to Work, CESCR, UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/18, 24 November 2005, para. 32).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!