Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

4 | PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 6
Alzery v. Sweden, Communication No. 1416/2005, Views of 10 November
2006
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 580/1994, Views of
19 April 2002
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women v. Mauritius,
Communication No. 35/1978, Views of 9 April 1981
Baboeram et al. v. Suriname, Communications Nos. 146/1983–148–
154/1983, Views of 4 April 1985
Bakhtiyari v. Australia, Communication No. 1069/2002, Views of
6 November 2003
Barbato v. Uruguay, Communication No. 84/1981, Views of 21 October
1982
C. v. Australia, Communication No. 900/1999, Views of 13 November 2002
Cámpora Schweizer v. Uruguay, Communication No. 66/1980, Views of
12 October 1982
Celepli v. Sweden, Communication No. 456/1991, Views of 26 July 1994
Celiberti de Casariego v. Uruguay, Communication No. 56/1979, Views
of 29 July 1981
Conteris v. Uruguay, Communication No. 139/1983, Views of 17 July
1985
Correia de Matos v. Portugal, Communication No. 1123/2002, Views of
18 April 2006
Dadar v. Canada, Communication No. 258/2004, Views of 5 December
2005
Danyal Shafiq v. Australia, Communication No. 1324/2004, Views of
13 November 2006
F.K.A.G. v. Australia, Communication No. 2094/2011, Views of 26 July
2013
Faure v. Australia, Communication No. 1036/2001, Views of 23 November
2005
G. T. v. Australia, Communication No. 706/1996**, Views of 4 December
1997
Gobin c. Mauritius, Communication No. 787/1997, Views of 20 August
2001
Hamilton v. Jamaica, Communication No. 616/1995, Views of 23 July
1999