18.11.2014 Views

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW | 155<br />

c) The right to representation<br />

The right to representation before the authority competent to decide<br />

on the expulsion is specifically guaranteed under Article 13 ICCPR and<br />

Article 1.1(c) of Protocol 7 ECHR.<br />

The Human Rights Committee has recommended that, in accordance<br />

with Article 13 ICCPR, States should grant “free legal assistance to<br />

asylum-seekers during all asylum procedures, whether ordinary or extraordinary”.<br />

516 It has also affirmed that States should “ensure that all<br />

asylum-seekers have access to counsel, legal aid and an interpreter”. 517<br />

The European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the procedural<br />

guarantees of Article 1 of Protocol 7 ECHR where “the decision on the<br />

applicant’s exclusion had <strong>no</strong>t been communicated to him for more than<br />

three months and [. . .] he had <strong>no</strong>t been allowed to submit reasons<br />

against his expulsion and to have his case reviewed with the participation<br />

of his counsel”. 518<br />

The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe also declared in its<br />

Twenty Guidelines on Forced Return that the time-limits for exercising<br />

a remedy against expulsion must <strong>no</strong>t be unreasonably short, and that<br />

“the remedy shall be accessible, which implies in particular that, where<br />

the subject of the removal order does <strong>no</strong>t have sufficient means to<br />

pay for necessary legal assistance, he/she should be given it free of<br />

charge, in accordance with the relevant national rules regarding legal<br />

aid”. 519 The guidelines are a declaratory instrument of the European<br />

human rights system. However, the Committee of Ministers considered<br />

this particular provision as embodying already existing obligations of<br />

Member States of the Council of Europe. 520<br />

d) Right to appeal<br />

While human rights treaty bodies and the Committee of Ministers of the<br />

Council of Europe have stopped short of recognising the right to a judicial<br />

appeal, they have insisted on guaranteeing the access to an appeal<br />

against expulsion decisions before an independent authority.<br />

The Human Rights Committee, applying Article 13 ICCPR, has found that<br />

“[a]n alien must be given full facilities for pursuing his remedy against<br />

516 Concluding Observations on Switzerland, CCPR, UN Doc. CCPR/C/CHE/CO/3, 29 October<br />

2009, para. 18; Concluding Observations on Ireland, CCPR, UN Doc. CCPR/C/IRL/CO/3,<br />

30 July 2008, para. 19.<br />

517 Concluding Observations on Japan, CCPR, UN Doc. CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, 18 December 2008,<br />

para. 25.<br />

518 Nolan and K. v. Russia, op. cit., fn. 472, para. 115.<br />

519 Twenty Guidelines on Forced Return, op. cit., fn. 510, Guideline 5.2.<br />

520 Ibid., Preamble 2(a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!