Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
232 | PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 6<br />
law and to national implementation of international obligations. The<br />
effectiveness will also depend on the legal system of each country and<br />
to what extent ESC rights have been incorporated into domestic law.<br />
Nevertheless, even where national legal systems do <strong>no</strong>t provide directly<br />
for remedies for ESC rights, their invocation may be a useful tool for the<br />
interpretation of national laws concerning the provision of benefits or<br />
social services for migrants, and may also help to support an eventual<br />
communication against a violation submitted to an international human<br />
rights mechanism.<br />
The CESCR has stressed that, “[w]hile the general approach of each<br />
legal system needs to be taken into account, there is <strong>no</strong> Covenant right<br />
which could <strong>no</strong>t, in the great majority of systems, be considered to possess<br />
at least some significant justiciable dimensions”. 914 The Committee<br />
accepts the possibility of resorting to administrative remedies for some<br />
rights. These must in any case be “accessible, affordable, timely and<br />
effective”. 915 However, the Committee stressed that there are some obligations<br />
“in relation to which the provision of some form of judicial<br />
remedy would seem indispensable in order to satisfy the requirements<br />
of the Covenant.” 916 It stressed that judicial review and the judiciary’s<br />
application of domestic law must be undertaken in consonance with the<br />
ICESCR, otherwise “[n]eglect by the courts of this responsibility is incompatible<br />
with the principle of the rule of law”. 917 The right of access to<br />
courts for <strong>no</strong>n-citizens without any discriminatory implementation, denial<br />
or omission of ESC rights has been also highlighted by the CERD. 918<br />
As <strong>no</strong>ted in Section I.4, the obligation of <strong>no</strong>n-discrimination is of immediate<br />
effect. 919 In addition, the CESCR has found of immediate effect<br />
the principle of gender equality (Article 3 ICESCR), the right to fair<br />
wages and equal remuneration for work of equal value without distinction<br />
of any kind (Article 7.1 ICESCR), freedom of association and trade<br />
unions rights (Article 8 ICESCR), essential rights relating to child labour<br />
(Article 10.3 ICESCR), the right to be free from hunger and to access<br />
basic shelter (article 11 ICESCR), the right to free and compulsory primary<br />
education (Article 13.2(a) ICESCR), the right of parents to have<br />
their children educated in respect of their religious and moral convictions<br />
(Article 13.3 ICESCR), the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish<br />
educational institutions (Article 13.4 ICESCR), and the freedom<br />
914 General Comment No. 9, The domestic application of the Covenant, CESCR, UN Doc.<br />
E/C.12/1998/24, 3 December 1998, para. 10.<br />
915 Ibid., para. 9.<br />
916 Ibid., para. 9<br />
917 Ibid., paras. 14 and 15.<br />
918 See, CERD, General Recommendation No. 30, op. cit., fn. 18, para. 29.<br />
919 CESCR, General Comment No. 3, op. cit., fn. 147, paras. 1 and 5. See, Articles 22 and 35,<br />
Limburg Principles, op. cit., fn. 888.