18.11.2014 Views

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 | PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 6<br />

Committee provides that the State Party has six months to submit to<br />

the Committee written explanations or statements clarifying the matter<br />

under consideration and the remedy, if any, that may have been taken<br />

by the State. Any explanations or statements submitted by the State<br />

Party will be communicated to the author of the communication, who<br />

may submit any additional written information or observations within<br />

fixed time-limits. 1400 For CERD, the State has three months from then<br />

to submit its reasons. These will be transmitted to the complainant who<br />

may oppose further observations. 1401<br />

Material: The Committee will take into consideration all the information<br />

made available to it by the parties. 1402 The CESCR also explicitly<br />

includes all relevant documentation from other UN bodies, specialised<br />

agencies, funds, programmes and mechanisms, and other international<br />

organisations, including from regional human rights systems. 1403<br />

Decision: The Committees will adopt their decision (Views) on<br />

the case and forward them to the parties. 1404 The Human Rights<br />

Committee’s rules of procedure explicitly say that this body’s decisions<br />

are public. 1405<br />

d) Friendly Settlement<br />

The CESCR is the only Committee which expressly provides for the possibility<br />

of reaching a friendly settlement. The settlement must be on the<br />

basis of the respect for the obligations set forth in the Covenant and<br />

closes the communication procedure. 1406 While other UN human rights<br />

treaties and corresponding rules of procedure do <strong>no</strong>t expressly provide<br />

for a procedure of friendly settlement, in practice the Committees may<br />

provide their good offices for reaching this kind of agreement if the<br />

parties so desire. 1407<br />

1400 Rules 99–100, CCPR Rules of Procedure.<br />

1401 Rule 94.2–4, CERD Rules of Procedure.<br />

1402 Rules 99–100, CCPR Rules of Procedure; Article 8 OP-ICESCR; Article 22.4–6 CAT; Rule 118.1,<br />

CAT Rules of Procedure; Article 14.7(a) ICERD; Article 7 OP-CEDAW; Rule 72, CEDAW Rules<br />

of Procedure; Article 77.5 ICRMW.<br />

1403 Article 8 OP-ICESCR.<br />

1404 Rules 99–100, CCPR Rules of Procedure; Article 22.7 CAT; Article 14.7(b) ICERD; Article 7<br />

OP-CEDAW; Rule 72, CEDAW Rules of Procedure; Article 77.6–7 ICRMW.<br />

1405 Rule 102(5), CCPR Rules of Procedure.<br />

1406 Article 7 OP-ICESCR.<br />

1407 See, Catarina de Albuquerque, Elements for an optional protocol to the International Covenant<br />

on Eco<strong>no</strong>mic, Social and Cultural Rights, Analytical paper by the Chairperson-Rapporteur,<br />

Open-ended working group on an optional protocol to the International Covenant on<br />

Eco<strong>no</strong>mic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2006/WG.23/2, 30 November 2005,<br />

para. 14; and CESCR, Report to the Commission on Human Rights on a draft optional protocol<br />

for the consideration of communications in relation to the International Covenant on Eco<strong>no</strong>mic,<br />

Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1997/105, 18 December 1996, para. 38.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!