Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
Universal-MigrationHRlaw-PG-no-6-Publications-PractitionersGuide-2014-eng
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
276 | PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 6<br />
port or equivalent document of a migrant worker or a member of his<br />
or her family.” 1162<br />
1. Non-discrimination and workplace rights<br />
A range of international instruments and standards contain requirements<br />
of <strong>no</strong>n-discrimination in relation to workplace rights, these are<br />
addressed below. The specific protection from discrimination on the<br />
basis of sex, as it applies to women migrant workers, is dealt with in<br />
Section 2 below. It should be <strong>no</strong>ted that the prohibition of discrimination,<br />
in particular as it relates to minimum work conditions, such as unfair<br />
dismissal, vacation, overtime and pay is an obligation of immediate<br />
effect (see, Chapter 5, Section I.2). 1163 The CESCR has also recognised<br />
that the right to fair wages and equal remuneration for work of equal<br />
value without distinction of any kind is of immediate effect. 1164<br />
a) ICESCR and ICERD<br />
The prohibition of discrimination in relation to workplace rights under<br />
the CESCR and CERD covers migrant workers and their families, regardless<br />
of legal status or documentation. 1165 The CESCR has been<br />
clear that the “Covenant rights apply to everyone including <strong>no</strong>n-nationals,<br />
such as refugees, asylum-seekers, stateless persons, migrant<br />
workers and victims of international trafficking, regardless of legal status<br />
and documentation”. 1166 Although disparate treatment of migrants<br />
or categories of migrants in respect of access to employment may be<br />
lawful, it can seldom be justified in relation to rights in the workplace.<br />
The CERD has stated that under ICERD, States must: “take effective<br />
measures to eliminate discrimination against <strong>no</strong>n-citizens in relation<br />
to working conditions and work requirements, including employment<br />
rules and practices with discriminatory purposes and effects; [. . .] to<br />
prevent and redress the serious problems commonly faced by <strong>no</strong>n-citizen<br />
workers, in particular by <strong>no</strong>n-citizen domestic workers, including<br />
debt bondage, passport retention, illegal confinement, rape and physical<br />
assault.” 1167 The CERD also defined the general principles applicable<br />
to all migrants: “while State Parties may refuse to offer jobs to<br />
<strong>no</strong>n-citizens without a work permit, all individuals are entitled to the<br />
1162 Article 21 ICRMW.<br />
1163 CESCR, General Comment No. 20, op. cit., fn. 22, para. 7; CESCR, General Comment No. 18,<br />
op. cit., fn. 1109, para. 19; Article 7 ICRMW; Concluding Observations on Republic of Korea,<br />
CESCR, op. cit., fn. 244, para. 14; Concluding Observations on Japan, CCPR, op. cit., fn. 517,<br />
para. 24; Concluding Observations on Kuwait, CESCR, op. cit., fn. 1160, para. 16.<br />
1164 CESCR, General Comment No. 3, op. cit., fn. 147, para. 5. See also, Article 15 ACHPR.<br />
1165 CESCR, General Comment No. 18, op. cit., fn. 1109, para. 18.<br />
1166 CESCR, General Comment No. 20, op. cit., fn. 22, para. 30.<br />
1167 CERD, General Recommendation No. 30, op. cit., fn. 18, paras. 33–34.