27.11.2014 Views

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 108<br />

Table 5: The mean anxiety and depression of students in A3 related to education-related questions and recent life events<br />

Quiestions<br />

Any important problem in the past 6 months?<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

If yes; what was the problem?<br />

Don’t want to say<br />

Personal problems<br />

Problems about intimates<br />

Problems about school<br />

Any suicide idea?<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Sometimes<br />

If yes; The time of the suicidal idea<br />

Don’t want to say<br />

Last one year<br />

More than one year before<br />

If yes; The reason of suicidal idea<br />

Don’t want to say<br />

Own problems<br />

School problems<br />

Pleased with the career selection?<br />

Always<br />

Generally<br />

Sometimes<br />

Never<br />

Any idea of abandon?<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Sometimes<br />

If yes or sometimes; Reason for abandon<br />

Don’t want to say<br />

Individual factors<br />

External factors<br />

Institutional factors<br />

Predilection<br />

Again medical career<br />

Never medical career<br />

Double minded<br />

2009-2010 (A3)<br />

N % Mean Scores Anxiety p Mean Scores Depression<br />

0.00<br />

0.02<br />

<strong>44</strong> 43.6 8.77 ± 4.04<br />

6.52 ± 3.13<br />

57 56.4 6.28 ± 3.92<br />

4.92 ± 3.83<br />

23<br />

9<br />

3<br />

9<br />

9<br />

81<br />

11<br />

5<br />

13<br />

2<br />

5<br />

7<br />

8<br />

23<br />

51<br />

20<br />

7<br />

26<br />

46<br />

29<br />

14<br />

28<br />

6<br />

7<br />

76<br />

9<br />

16<br />

52.3<br />

20.5<br />

6.8<br />

20.5<br />

8.9<br />

80.2<br />

10.9<br />

25.0<br />

65.0<br />

10.0<br />

25.0<br />

35.0<br />

40.0<br />

22.8<br />

50.5<br />

19.8<br />

6.9<br />

25.7<br />

45.5<br />

28.7<br />

25.5<br />

50.9<br />

10.9<br />

12.7<br />

75.2<br />

8.9<br />

15.8<br />

8.60 ± 3.98<br />

10.11 ± 3.25<br />

10.33 ± 5.50<br />

7.33 ± 4.55<br />

11.77 ± 3.83<br />

6.30 ± 3.49<br />

11.54 ± 4.10<br />

10.80 ± 2.77<br />

11.92 ± 4.40<br />

12.00 ± 4.24<br />

12.00 ± 3.08<br />

12.14 ± 4.63<br />

11.00 ± 4.03<br />

4.91 ± 3.27<br />

7.52 ± 3.71<br />

7.80 ± 4.06<br />

13.00 ± 4.35<br />

9.38 ± 4.57<br />

5.76 ± 3.39<br />

8.10 ± 3.94<br />

7.62 ± 3.54<br />

9.50 ± 4.59<br />

8.83 ± 4.70<br />

7.57 ± 4.03<br />

6.89 ± 3.92<br />

10.55 ± 6.16<br />

7.81 ± 3.14<br />

0.46<br />

0.00<br />

0.86<br />

0.84<br />

0.00<br />

0.00<br />

0.51<br />

0.03<br />

6.69 ± 3.36<br />

6.22 ± 2.72<br />

6.33 ± 2.30<br />

6.<strong>44</strong> ± 3.57<br />

10.00±3.24<br />

4.86±3.31<br />

7.63±2.94<br />

7.00 ± 1.22<br />

9.07 ± 3.70<br />

10.50 ± 2.12<br />

9.00 ± 3.39<br />

9.42 ± 3.15<br />

7.87 ± 3.<strong>44</strong><br />

3.52 ± 2.96<br />

5.56 ± 3.36<br />

6.50 ± 3.57<br />

10.42 ± 2.25<br />

6.69 ± 3.50<br />

4.76 ± 3.87<br />

6.03 ± 3.05<br />

6.78 ± 2.80<br />

6.75 ± 3.50<br />

6.00 ± 3.89<br />

4.14 ± 1.95<br />

4.97 ± 3.42<br />

8.77 ± 3.59<br />

6.93 ± 3.45<br />

0.98<br />

0.00<br />

0.35<br />

0.65<br />

0.00<br />

0.00<br />

0.27<br />

0.00<br />

Aproximately fifty percent of the participants were<br />

female in A1 (49.6%, n = 69). The female ratio was<br />

54.1% and 55.4% in the prospective years. There<br />

were no significant differences between the students<br />

participating at the three assesments (A1 – A3) in terms<br />

of socio-demographic variables except family income.<br />

In all three assessments “occupation guarantee” was<br />

the main reason of a medical career decision. Table<br />

1 summarizes the socio-demographic variables and<br />

education related characteristics of the students.<br />

The mean anxiety score of the students’ of A1<br />

was 7.35 ± 3.17. Students whose family incomes were<br />

above 1000 Turkish Lira (TL) had higher anxiety scores<br />

(p < 0.05). In A2, students from rural parts of Turkey<br />

and those who had no information about working<br />

conditions before decision making were more anxious<br />

(p = 0.00). In A3 students who did not make informed<br />

decisions were feeling more anxiety (p = 0.00). The<br />

mean anxiety and depression scores of students’ in<br />

three years are shown in Table 2.<br />

As regards depression the mean depression score<br />

was the highest in A2 and was found to be 6.66 ± 4.11<br />

(p = 0.00). Male students had significantly higher<br />

scores in depression scale in all three assessments (p<br />

< 0.05). In A1 and A2 “coming from rural areas” and<br />

“lower family incomes” were the main factors which<br />

were making students more depressed (p < 0.05).<br />

The depression scores of students’ for three years are<br />

represented in Table 3.<br />

The mean anxiety and depression scores were<br />

8.47± 4.26 and 6.66 ± 4.11 in the A2, respectively. The<br />

questions concerning education-related details, recent<br />

life events and predilection showed that students who<br />

faced an important problem in the past six months<br />

were significantly more anxious and more depressed<br />

compared to others in A2. Students who had suicidal<br />

idea had significantly higher scores in HADS (p <<br />

0.05). The mean anxiety and depression scores of<br />

students in A2 and their comparisons are shown in<br />

Table 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!