Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw
Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw
Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 90<br />
Editorial<br />
Can Science Teach a Thing or Two to Nature?<br />
Belle M Hegde<br />
The Journal of the Science of Healing Outcomes, State College, Pennsylvania, USA and Mangalore, India*<br />
Manipal University, Manipal India**<br />
The Middlesex Medical School, University of London, UK#<br />
Northern Colorado University, USA##<br />
Kuwait Medical Journal <strong>2012</strong>; <strong>44</strong> (2): 90 - 91<br />
“A great man is always willing to be little”<br />
Ralph Waldo Emerson<br />
Science is a method only and its job is to try and<br />
understand nature. With the advent of paper money,<br />
human greed, which follows money like a shadow,<br />
became more important in science than all the other<br />
principles governing scientific research. It was<br />
shocking to read the following study in a leading<br />
American Journal some time ago. The inference of the<br />
study makes a mockery of nature’s best kept secret -<br />
mother’s milk is the best tonic for the immune system<br />
of the new born; the longer one can take mother’s milk<br />
the healthier that person will live. Once we stop taking<br />
mother’s milk, we lose our enzymes to digest any milk<br />
for the rest of our lives! Mother’s milk contains the best<br />
fatty acid for the development and good health of the<br />
immune system - sodium mono-laureate. Along with<br />
mother’s milk, the child is also hard wired to pick up<br />
dirt from room floorings while crawling to stimulate<br />
its immune system to develop antibodies against most<br />
germs - nature’s method of vaccination.<br />
Now comes this study from the CDC, a<br />
conventionally authentic <strong>org</strong>anization, looking after<br />
the health of the public! The fault is not with science<br />
but with the man behind the science. Even in the past<br />
there have been instances of those writing papers from<br />
such <strong>org</strong>anizations being hired by vested interests!<br />
This is nothing new and I am sure it is another one<br />
of those attempts by such elements in the lucrative<br />
vaccine industry. Let us see the inference of the study.<br />
“The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of<br />
rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries<br />
could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA<br />
and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by<br />
their infants at the time of immunization that could<br />
effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies<br />
to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying<br />
breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be<br />
evaluated” [1] .<br />
Ethen Huff, a staff reporter of Natural News writes:<br />
“The CDC researchers began their investigation<br />
by searching for answers as to why children from<br />
underdeveloped countries typically do not respond<br />
as well to the live oral rotavirus vaccine as children<br />
in developed countries typically do. They came to<br />
the conclusion that breast milk, which is packed<br />
with immune-building immunoglobulin A (IgA),<br />
lactoferrin, lysozyme, and various other important<br />
immune factors, inhibits the vaccine from working.<br />
Breast milk, of course, is a young child’s lifeline.<br />
It naturally builds immunity during childhood<br />
development, and provides perfect and balanced<br />
nutrition necessary for human growth. Withholding<br />
breast milk in order to accommodate the rotavirus<br />
vaccine, as the CDC researchers suggest, is an<br />
absolutely insane notion that will deprive children of<br />
vital nutrition and proper immune development.<br />
But it is ludicrous that notions like these are birthed<br />
from philosophies that view drugs and vaccines as<br />
being equal, or even superior, to natural food. Oral<br />
rotavirus vaccines contain live viruses, they have<br />
questionable efficacy to begin with, and they are even<br />
known to cause rotavirus infections. They are also<br />
linked to causing a variety of negative side effects,<br />
including diarrhea, which is a condition the vaccine is<br />
supposed to prevent!” [2] .<br />
There is so much controversy in the whole science<br />
of vaccination. It will not be a good idea to promote<br />
the idea of asking mothers not to breast feed their<br />
babies around vaccinations of which today there are<br />
26 in all in the USA. In essence, if the mother is breast<br />
feeding for only a few months this policy will deny<br />
the child the best elixir nature intended to keep the<br />
child’s immune system going all its life. I have been<br />
very strongly feeling that the essential need for science<br />
Address correspondence to:<br />
Prof. B. M. Hegde, MD, FRCP, FRCPE, FRCPG, FRCPI, FACC, FAMS, “Manjunath”, Pais Hills, Bejai, Mangalore-575004, India.<br />
Tel: +91 824 245 0450; E-mail: hegdebm@gmail.com; web site: www.bmhegde.com<br />
*Editor in Chief, **Vice Chancellor (Retd), #Former Visiting Professor of Cardiology, ##Affiliate Professor of Human Health.<br />
E-mail: hegdebm@gmail.com