27.11.2014 Views

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 44 # 2 June 2012 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 90<br />

Editorial<br />

Can Science Teach a Thing or Two to Nature?<br />

Belle M Hegde<br />

The Journal of the Science of Healing Outcomes, State College, Pennsylvania, USA and Mangalore, India*<br />

Manipal University, Manipal India**<br />

The Middlesex Medical School, University of London, UK#<br />

Northern Colorado University, USA##<br />

Kuwait Medical Journal <strong>2012</strong>; <strong>44</strong> (2): 90 - 91<br />

“A great man is always willing to be little”<br />

Ralph Waldo Emerson<br />

Science is a method only and its job is to try and<br />

understand nature. With the advent of paper money,<br />

human greed, which follows money like a shadow,<br />

became more important in science than all the other<br />

principles governing scientific research. It was<br />

shocking to read the following study in a leading<br />

American Journal some time ago. The inference of the<br />

study makes a mockery of nature’s best kept secret -<br />

mother’s milk is the best tonic for the immune system<br />

of the new born; the longer one can take mother’s milk<br />

the healthier that person will live. Once we stop taking<br />

mother’s milk, we lose our enzymes to digest any milk<br />

for the rest of our lives! Mother’s milk contains the best<br />

fatty acid for the development and good health of the<br />

immune system - sodium mono-laureate. Along with<br />

mother’s milk, the child is also hard wired to pick up<br />

dirt from room floorings while crawling to stimulate<br />

its immune system to develop antibodies against most<br />

germs - nature’s method of vaccination.<br />

Now comes this study from the CDC, a<br />

conventionally authentic <strong>org</strong>anization, looking after<br />

the health of the public! The fault is not with science<br />

but with the man behind the science. Even in the past<br />

there have been instances of those writing papers from<br />

such <strong>org</strong>anizations being hired by vested interests!<br />

This is nothing new and I am sure it is another one<br />

of those attempts by such elements in the lucrative<br />

vaccine industry. Let us see the inference of the study.<br />

“The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of<br />

rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries<br />

could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA<br />

and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by<br />

their infants at the time of immunization that could<br />

effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies<br />

to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying<br />

breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be<br />

evaluated” [1] .<br />

Ethen Huff, a staff reporter of Natural News writes:<br />

“The CDC researchers began their investigation<br />

by searching for answers as to why children from<br />

underdeveloped countries typically do not respond<br />

as well to the live oral rotavirus vaccine as children<br />

in developed countries typically do. They came to<br />

the conclusion that breast milk, which is packed<br />

with immune-building immunoglobulin A (IgA),<br />

lactoferrin, lysozyme, and various other important<br />

immune factors, inhibits the vaccine from working.<br />

Breast milk, of course, is a young child’s lifeline.<br />

It naturally builds immunity during childhood<br />

development, and provides perfect and balanced<br />

nutrition necessary for human growth. Withholding<br />

breast milk in order to accommodate the rotavirus<br />

vaccine, as the CDC researchers suggest, is an<br />

absolutely insane notion that will deprive children of<br />

vital nutrition and proper immune development.<br />

But it is ludicrous that notions like these are birthed<br />

from philosophies that view drugs and vaccines as<br />

being equal, or even superior, to natural food. Oral<br />

rotavirus vaccines contain live viruses, they have<br />

questionable efficacy to begin with, and they are even<br />

known to cause rotavirus infections. They are also<br />

linked to causing a variety of negative side effects,<br />

including diarrhea, which is a condition the vaccine is<br />

supposed to prevent!” [2] .<br />

There is so much controversy in the whole science<br />

of vaccination. It will not be a good idea to promote<br />

the idea of asking mothers not to breast feed their<br />

babies around vaccinations of which today there are<br />

26 in all in the USA. In essence, if the mother is breast<br />

feeding for only a few months this policy will deny<br />

the child the best elixir nature intended to keep the<br />

child’s immune system going all its life. I have been<br />

very strongly feeling that the essential need for science<br />

Address correspondence to:<br />

Prof. B. M. Hegde, MD, FRCP, FRCPE, FRCPG, FRCPI, FACC, FAMS, “Manjunath”, Pais Hills, Bejai, Mangalore-575004, India.<br />

Tel: +91 824 245 0450; E-mail: hegdebm@gmail.com; web site: www.bmhegde.com<br />

*Editor in Chief, **Vice Chancellor (Retd), #Former Visiting Professor of Cardiology, ##Affiliate Professor of Human Health.<br />

E-mail: hegdebm@gmail.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!