01.12.2014 Views

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)<br />

While there has been progress since when they first started mining in Zambia, the<br />

Chinese operations—NFCA underground mining, Sino Metals, and Chambishi Copper<br />

Smelter in particular—frequently fail to provide prompt replacement of “personal<br />

protective equipment” to employees. All too often, this leads directly to unnecessary<br />

workplace accidents and health consequences. In contrast to the practices at the<br />

Chinese-run copper mines, miners interviewed from the other multinational<br />

companies—spec<strong>if</strong>ically, Mopani Copper Mines, Konkola Copper Mines, and<br />

Kansanshi—said their companies have a standard procedure in which they were able to<br />

obtain a replacement when their PPE was damaged during work (see text box, below,<br />

on “<strong>Be</strong>st practices in the Copperbelt”).<br />

ILO Convention No. 176 requires employers to “provide and maintain at no cost to the<br />

worker suitable protective equipment [and] clothing as necessary.” 121<br />

Miners at the Chinese copper mining operations said that their employers had improved<br />

considerably at providing PPE since first starting work in Zambia. Until several years ago, the<br />

Chinese companies often did not provide any protective equipment; at best, workers might<br />

receive a few of the items they needed, as described by an underground miner at NFCA:<br />

It was in 2008 and 2009 that the union really took up the issue of PPE, that<br />

the Chinese had to provide work suits and boots, hard hats, and the other<br />

necessary equipment. <strong>Be</strong>fore you were lucky to get a couple pieces, but you<br />

would never get close to what is required by the mining regulations. Those<br />

efforts in 2008 and 2009 paid off. But even though it’s better, we still face<br />

problems with PPE that don’t exist in other mines. 122<br />

A worker in the Chinese-owned smelter, CCS, likewise said:<br />

When we first started, the safety situation was very, very bad. They did not<br />

give us the required PPE. We worked with no equipment and were exposed<br />

to lots of problems. People were often burned from the acid…. The Mines<br />

Safety Department finally intervened after lots of complaints, and now we<br />

get leather suits, shoes for the smelter, leather gloves, and a face shield. It<br />

121 ILO Convention No. 176, art. 9(c).<br />

122 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with underground drill operator A at NFCA, Chambishi, November 5, 2010.<br />

39 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | NOVEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!