“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse†- Human Rights Watch
“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse†- Human Rights Watch
“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse†- Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
that once such a committee is established, firms have simply sacked those<br />
staff that constitute the committee, sending a clear message to the<br />
workforce that unionism will not be tolerated. MUZ representatives report<br />
that they are having to adopt underhand tactics, “The moment they are<br />
publicly known we have ended up finding that the whole shoot are<br />
dismissed. So, when you go there, once you have ident<strong>if</strong>ied a shadow<br />
committee they have to clandestinely organise.” 284<br />
In response to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>’s letter describing our main findings, the Chinese<br />
parastatal that owns the four copper mining operations in Zambia denied that either CCS<br />
or Sino Metals had ever interfered with workers’ rights to join the union of their choice.<br />
Spec<strong>if</strong>ically on CCS, the response indicated that discussions with MUZ had been<br />
undertaken in 2009, but MUZ did not present the signatures necessary to establish a<br />
recognition agreement. 285 As noted above, MUZ officials and CCS employees told <strong>Human</strong><br />
<strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that this was due to active undermining by CCS management. The letter from<br />
CNMC further states that “[w]e have discussed this with NUMAW leaders who are of the<br />
opinion that that for a company like Chambishi Copper Smelter, where there are less than<br />
1,000 workers, one union suffices.” 286 It is unclear why CCS would consult with NUMAW,<br />
MUZ’s competitor union, to determine whether the presence of a second union was<br />
warranted—rather than allow the miners themselves to make the decision.<br />
In regards to Sino Metals, the CNMC letter stated:<br />
Although there is only one union in the company at the moment, this<br />
cannot be used to illustrate that the company is engaging in “anti-union<br />
activities.” The type of union in a company, and the number of unions that<br />
choose to enter the company, depend on the choices that the workers make<br />
based on their free will, and are matters to do with the workers themselves.<br />
The company will not, and does not have the right to, interfere with any<br />
union that enters the company lawfully. 287<br />
As with CCS, MUZ officials and Sino Metals employees expressed in interviews with <strong>Human</strong><br />
<strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that they did not have the freedom to establish a MUZ branch office.<br />
284 Frasier and Lungu, For Whom the Windfalls, p. 24.<br />
285 Letter from CNMC to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, October 8, 2011.<br />
286 Ibid.<br />
287 Ibid.<br />
89 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | NOVEMBER 2011