01.12.2014 Views

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that once such a committee is established, firms have simply sacked those<br />

staff that constitute the committee, sending a clear message to the<br />

workforce that unionism will not be tolerated. MUZ representatives report<br />

that they are having to adopt underhand tactics, “The moment they are<br />

publicly known we have ended up finding that the whole shoot are<br />

dismissed. So, when you go there, once you have ident<strong>if</strong>ied a shadow<br />

committee they have to clandestinely organise.” 284<br />

In response to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>’s letter describing our main findings, the Chinese<br />

parastatal that owns the four copper mining operations in Zambia denied that either CCS<br />

or Sino Metals had ever interfered with workers’ rights to join the union of their choice.<br />

Spec<strong>if</strong>ically on CCS, the response indicated that discussions with MUZ had been<br />

undertaken in 2009, but MUZ did not present the signatures necessary to establish a<br />

recognition agreement. 285 As noted above, MUZ officials and CCS employees told <strong>Human</strong><br />

<strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that this was due to active undermining by CCS management. The letter from<br />

CNMC further states that “[w]e have discussed this with NUMAW leaders who are of the<br />

opinion that that for a company like Chambishi Copper Smelter, where there are less than<br />

1,000 workers, one union suffices.” 286 It is unclear why CCS would consult with NUMAW,<br />

MUZ’s competitor union, to determine whether the presence of a second union was<br />

warranted—rather than allow the miners themselves to make the decision.<br />

In regards to Sino Metals, the CNMC letter stated:<br />

Although there is only one union in the company at the moment, this<br />

cannot be used to illustrate that the company is engaging in “anti-union<br />

activities.” The type of union in a company, and the number of unions that<br />

choose to enter the company, depend on the choices that the workers make<br />

based on their free will, and are matters to do with the workers themselves.<br />

The company will not, and does not have the right to, interfere with any<br />

union that enters the company lawfully. 287<br />

As with CCS, MUZ officials and Sino Metals employees expressed in interviews with <strong>Human</strong><br />

<strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that they did not have the freedom to establish a MUZ branch office.<br />

284 Frasier and Lungu, For Whom the Windfalls, p. 24.<br />

285 Letter from CNMC to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, October 8, 2011.<br />

286 Ibid.<br />

287 Ibid.<br />

89 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | NOVEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!