01.12.2014 Views

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

“You'll Be Fired if You Refuse” - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

frequent, that two to three a week is model. We have tried to convey that<br />

this isn’t China, that standards are d<strong>if</strong>ferent, but it has been d<strong>if</strong>ficult. 157<br />

Several other miners at CLM said the rise in accidents would have been even worse were it<br />

not for the considerable experience of the miners at CLM; indeed, almost every miner there<br />

interviewed by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> had worked in the mine, through various ownership<br />

changes, for more than 15 years. However, the Chinese management’s treatment of safety<br />

officers had become so bad, according to one underground miner who was also a local<br />

union official, that three safety officers had recently resigned:<br />

<strong>You</strong> cannot compare the Chinese [investors] to any of our previous<br />

employers on the enforcement of safety regulations, they are much worse.<br />

Normally, <strong>if</strong> you find an area that is not well ventilated, maybe the safety<br />

officer closes it off until the situation is better. But with the Chinese, they’ll<br />

threaten the safety officer and then he’ll rescind the decision. It’s been so<br />

bad that three guys from the safety office have resigned because of<br />

d<strong>if</strong>ferences with management; they couldn’t work for the Chinese, they<br />

couldn’t compromise themselves like they were having to. 158<br />

The same miner noted that on December 31, 2010, the mine suffered a fatality when a side<br />

wall peeled off underground and crushed a miner. He felt that the accident could have<br />

been avoided had safety officers controlled adherence to safety regulations underground,<br />

without interference from management. 159<br />

CNMC’s letter to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> states that “it is impossible to say” that safety<br />

conditions have worsened since it took over China Luanshya Mine in 2009, as “safety<br />

management measures are essentially a continuation of previous systems.” 160 Miners<br />

interviewed by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> agreed that the structural safety mechanisms were<br />

essentially maintained, but, as noted above, described far greater pressures to place<br />

production over strict adherence to these mechanisms. CNMC’s letter also highlighted a<br />

number of investments that have improved the technology and mechanization of the<br />

mine. 161 As noted in the Good Investors, Bad Employers text box, the capital investment at<br />

157 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with blast engineer A at CLM, Luanshya, November 10, 2010.<br />

158 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with surface and underground electrician for high-voltage areas at CLM, Luanshya, July 17,<br />

2011.<br />

159 Ibid.<br />

160 Letter from CNMC to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, October 8, 2011.<br />

161 Ibid.<br />

53 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | NOVEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!