Outline of Quino Recovery Plan - The Xerces Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR QUINO CHECKERSPOT RECOVERY PLAN Task Total Cost ($1,000's) Priority Task Task Description Duration Responsible Estimated Cost # # (Years) Agencies ($1,000's) FY FY FY FY FY 01 02 03 04 05 2 5.5. Determine the effect of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrogen. 2 5.6. Survey areas between and around habitat complexes to determine where there is intervening and/or additional landscape connectivity. 3 USFWS* 120 40 40 40 TBD USFWS* TBD 2 5.7. Map habitat complex attributes TBD USFWS* TBD 99 2 5.8. Northwest Riverside Recovery Unit: Investigate the possibility of remaining occupied or suitable habitat proximal to the (subsequently developed) Quino checkerspot population near Murrieta 3 USFWS* 36 12 12 12 2 6 Manage activity on trails where habitat occurs in recreational use areas, Ongoing USFWS*, RC, LMRMC, SC, CDPR TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD particularly during the active season for Quino checkerspot larvae and adults (i.e. November through May) 2 7. Locate or introduce two populations or metapopulations in the remaining TBD USFWS*, USMCCP, USMCASM, CSD TBD undeveloped coastal areas of the Quino checkerspot’s historic range. 2 8. Reduce fire frequency and illegal trash Ongoing USFWS*, RC, SDC, TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD dumping in habitat areas BLM
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR QUINO CHECKERSPOT RECOVERY PLAN Task Total Cost ($1,000's) Priority Task Task Description Duration Responsible Estimated Cost # # (Years) Agencies ($1,000's) FY FY FY FY FY 01 02 03 04 05 3 9.1. Survey for butterflies and habitat TBD USFWS*, BLM, TBD between the South Riverside/North USFS, SDC, RC, San Diego Recovery Unit and the SDSU Southeast San Diego Recovery Unit in eastern San Diego County. 3 9.2. Survey for butterflies and habitat between State Route 94 and Interstate TBD USFWS* BLM, USFS, CSD, TBD 8 in southern San Diego County. SDC 100 3 9.3. Survey for butterflies and habitat in proposed Recovery Units 4 USFWS* USFS, USMCCP, USMCASM, CSD, OC, SDC TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 3 9.4. Survey for butterflies and habitat along the eastern slope of the Santa Ana 4 USFWS*, USFS, SDSU, TNC TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Mountains, south of Lake Elsinore 3 10.1. Northwest Riverside Recovery Unit: 3 USFWS*, SDC, BLM, 506 169 169 168 Survey undeveloped areas in the CSD southern portion of the Recovery Unit. 3 10.2. Southwest and South Riverside Recovery Units: Survey areas between the Brown Canyon site (near Hemet) and the Silverado and Skinner/Johnson habitat complexes. 3 USFWS*, RC 700 234 233 233
Page 1 and 2:
QUINO CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY (Euphyd
Page 3 and 4:
DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Status: T
Page 7 and 8:
temporal and geographic patterns of
Page 9 and 10:
9) Manage activity on trails where
Page 11 and 12:
A. References .....................
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 1. Quino checkerspot butterf
Page 15 and 16:
Insert Figure 3 4
Page 17 and 18:
Euphydryas chalcedona. At the same
Page 19 and 20:
The Quino checkerspot butterfly pri
Page 21 and 22:
natural lands are absent, by costly
Page 23 and 24:
connectivity that may have existed
Page 25 and 26:
Mexico. Another recent record is lo
Page 27 and 28:
dwarf plantain (Plantago erecta) ca
Page 29 and 30:
Diapausing Euphydryas editha larvae
Page 31 and 32:
not possible below about 16 degrees
Page 33 and 34:
1994, Rausher 1982). Singer et al.
Page 35 and 36:
prediapause secondary hosts are imp
Page 37 and 38:
population of prediapause larvae. L
Page 39 and 40:
does not necessarily mean that smal
Page 41 and 42:
although it is not clear whether th
Page 43 and 44:
Dezzani 1998, Stylinski and Allen 1
Page 45 and 46:
Consumption of nonnative plants by
Page 47 and 48:
per year) (Bytnerowicz et al. 1987,
Page 49 and 50:
y almost 100 miles, and shifted the
Page 51 and 52:
Conservation Plan. Several other pl
Page 53 and 54:
Plan in July of 1996. No extant Qui
Page 55 and 56:
G. Recovery Strategy The survival a
Page 57 and 58:
Along with protecting habitat, equa
Page 59 and 60: In areas targeted for Quino checker
Page 61 and 62: checkerspot habitat community. Area
Page 63 and 64: ovata), fiddleneck (Amsinckia spp.)
Page 65 and 66: (Collinsia concolor) occurs in smal
Page 67 and 68: This Recovery Unit is located in so
Page 69 and 70: ut research is needed to determine
Page 71 and 72: within the proposed Recovery Unit i
Page 73 and 74: occupancy. Most of the upper canyon
Page 75 and 76: Insert Figure 5 64
Page 81 and 82: The number of known occupied habita
Page 83 and 84: C. Recovery Task Narrative Priority
Page 85 and 86: 1.2.1. Enhance or restore landscape
Page 87 and 88: should include, degree of nonnative
Page 89 and 90: 11. Protect the remaining undevelop
Page 91 and 92: Boughton, D. A. 2000. The Dispersal
Page 93 and 94: Ecological Impacts on the Golden St
Page 95 and 96: Malo, J. E., and F. Suarez. 1995. C
Page 97 and 98: Ecology Taking Flight: Butterflies
Page 99 and 100: Thomas, C. D. and I. Hanski. 1997.
Page 101 and 102: B. Personal Communications Bauer, D
Page 103 and 104: Definitions and Abbreviations Used
Page 105 and 106: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR QUINO C
Page 107 and 108: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR QUINO C
Page 109: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR QUINO C
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX I Quino Checkerspot Butter
Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX II Habitat Restoration Met
Page 117 and 118: • Cut thatch and dead nonnative p
Page 119 and 120: Native Plants for Habitat Restorati
Page 121 and 122: y Quino checkerspot, generalist pol
Page 123 and 124: Salvaged topsoil can also be used f
Page 125 and 126: Costs associated with removing that
Page 127 and 128: cover is quite different from the g
Page 129 and 130: APPENDIX III The Annual Forbland Hy
Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX IV Glossary of Terms Diapa
show all

Outline of Quino Recovery Plan - The Xerces Society

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?