02.12.2014 Views

Outline of Quino Recovery Plan - The Xerces Society

Outline of Quino Recovery Plan - The Xerces Society

Outline of Quino Recovery Plan - The Xerces Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

females and males at the end <strong>of</strong> the adult flight season is recommended, and<br />

should not significantly affect metapopulation persistence (Cushman et al.<br />

1994). Captured females that have already deposited most <strong>of</strong> their eggs can be<br />

induced to produce and deposit more eggs than would naturally occur (G. Pratt,<br />

pers. comm.). Captive augmentation facilities should also include butterfly<br />

ranches within the distribution <strong>of</strong> extant metapopulations. Butterfly ranches<br />

would consist <strong>of</strong> semi-natural areas designed and managed to produce high<br />

density populations that could disperse naturally or be manually distributed to<br />

augment extant metapopulations (B. Toon, pers. comm.).<br />

6. Multiple Species Reserves and the <strong>Quino</strong> Checkerspot<br />

For invertebrates, including the vast number <strong>of</strong> poorly described or undescribed<br />

species that are undoubtedly also endangered but not listed (Redak 2000), the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> habitat preserved is more crucial than the extent (Ehrlich 1992). Thus<br />

mitigation ratios based solely on acreage are not likely to be valid. However,<br />

losses <strong>of</strong> lower quality <strong>Quino</strong> checkerspot habitat may threaten the preservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> other species, even if butterfly populations are not likely to be jeopardized.<br />

Euphydryas editha butterflies are good indicators <strong>of</strong> biodiversity and habitat<br />

quality because they are closely tied to the taxonomic diversity <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />

(Launer and Murphy 1994); more so than, for example, birds (Ehrlich 1992).<br />

Euphydryas editha is probably sensitive to pesticides and responsive to various<br />

other general aspects <strong>of</strong> habitat quality that are not always apparent (Ehrlich<br />

1992). Launer and Murphy (1994) found that if only sites supporting the largest<br />

Euphydryas editha populations were preserved, or if portions <strong>of</strong> a site classified<br />

as “marginal” butterfly habitat were lost, the proportion <strong>of</strong> protected plant<br />

species dropped substantially. Also, although it is true that insect populations<br />

typically require smaller habitat areas than populations <strong>of</strong> large vertebrates<br />

(Ehrlich 1992), Euphydryas editha requires relatively large areas <strong>of</strong> conserved<br />

landscape connectivity. That is, maintenance <strong>of</strong> dispersal corridors linking a<br />

network <strong>of</strong> habitat patches over a large area will be required to conserve <strong>Quino</strong><br />

checkerspot metapopulations.<br />

Undeveloped wildlands adjacent to and among <strong>Quino</strong> checkerspot<br />

metapopulation distributions (or habitat complexes if metapopulation<br />

distributions are not described) should be maintained because they contain<br />

landscape connectivity essential to other species that are part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Quino</strong><br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!