FINLAND & PALESTINE Proceedings of a Joint Workshop
FINLAND & PALESTINE Proceedings of a Joint Workshop
FINLAND & PALESTINE Proceedings of a Joint Workshop
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
lead to the liberation <strong>of</strong> Palestine. This revolution takes different<br />
forms to be carried out at the organizational, military, political,<br />
and diplomatic levels. The complementary nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different forms <strong>of</strong> revolution guarantees the continuity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
struggle until victory is achieved. The 1987 Intifada as a popular<br />
revolution imposed some changes at the local, regional and<br />
international levels. It led to the declaration <strong>of</strong> independence<br />
after the disengagement decision made by Jordan. The Intifada<br />
also forced Israel to recognize the PLO as a peace partner with<br />
whom it had to sign a peace agreement based on UN resolutions<br />
242, 338 and the principle <strong>of</strong> land for peace. Once these resolutions<br />
are implemented, a Palestinian state will be established<br />
after the removal <strong>of</strong> the Israeli occupation and its settlements.<br />
The stalling and deception policy Israel has practiced since the<br />
peace project started emptied the project <strong>of</strong> its positive aspects.<br />
Israel continued to build new settlements and expand<br />
the present ones as part <strong>of</strong> a systematic attempt to impose the<br />
version <strong>of</strong> peace it envisages. It aimed to divide the occupied<br />
territories into cantons surrounded by settlements. Such a<br />
situation will not allow for any kind <strong>of</strong> territorial continuity that<br />
is the pre-requisite for establishing the Palestinian state with<br />
Jerusalem as its capital on the basis <strong>of</strong> UN Resolution 181.<br />
At Camp David \1 2 , the moment <strong>of</strong> truth that the two parties<br />
arrived at led to a confrontation. The Palestinian leadership<br />
refused the Clinton-Barak's proposals that ignored, among<br />
other things, the right <strong>of</strong> return and the Palestinian interests in<br />
Jerusalem. When Barak's government failed to impose its<br />
2 A Middle East Peace Summit at Camp David <strong>of</strong> July 2000 took place<br />
between U.S President Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and<br />
Palestinian President Vasser Arafat. It was an ultimately unsuccessful attempt<br />
to negotiate a "final status settlement" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<br />
135