29.12.2014 Views

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3. Mirror Energy Differences (MED), i.e. differences <strong>in</strong><br />

excitation energy for analogue states <strong>in</strong> mirror nuclei, for the<br />

heaviest known mass triplet, A=54 (red l<strong>in</strong>e), extracted from<br />

experiments employ<strong>in</strong>g the EUROBALL and more recently the<br />

RISING spectrometers. To illustrate the cross- conjugate symmetry,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the shell, MEDs <strong>of</strong> mass A=42 are shown as well (green<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e). MEDs are orig<strong>in</strong>ated by isosp<strong>in</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nucleus. Theoretical description (blue l<strong>in</strong>e), with large-scale SM<br />

calculations, comprises the s<strong>in</strong>gle particle, radial and multipole<br />

(alignment) Coulomb contributions, as well as a sizeable additional<br />

isosp<strong>in</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g contribution not understood hitherto (black l<strong>in</strong>es).<br />

Consequently, pairs <strong>of</strong> nuclei with mirror<strong>in</strong>g values<br />

<strong>of</strong> N and Z (across the N=Z l<strong>in</strong>e) are expected to have<br />

excitations differ<strong>in</strong>g only by the Coulomb contributions<br />

(mirror energy). Precise measurements <strong>of</strong> mirror energies<br />

thus provide a str<strong>in</strong>gent test <strong>of</strong> the effective nuclear<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction. Indeed, exist<strong>in</strong>g studies (Figure 3) have suggested<br />

modifications to the standard nuclear <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

used <strong>in</strong> shell- model calculations. Therefore, there is a<br />

need to measure mirror pairs with large isosp<strong>in</strong> quantum<br />

numbers to maximise the difference <strong>in</strong> the Coulomb<br />

contributions. These studies will only be possible us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the next generation RIB facilities. The challenge is to<br />

measure mirror energies near or even beyond the proton<br />

drip-l<strong>in</strong>e and to <strong>in</strong>vestigate if shape changes and shape<br />

coexistence could play a role <strong>in</strong> the differences between<br />

isobaric multiplets <strong>in</strong> medium-mass nuclei. Therefore,<br />

<strong>in</strong>strumentation comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g gamma-ray track<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

light charged-particle detector arrays is <strong>of</strong> paramount<br />

importance.<br />

Limits <strong>of</strong> existence <strong>in</strong> proton-rich nuclei<br />

and 100 Sn<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most relevant questions <strong>in</strong> nuclear physics<br />

concerns the limits <strong>of</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> nuclei, <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> protons and neutrons. Experimental as well<br />

as theoretical efforts are cont<strong>in</strong>uously made to map the<br />

drip-l<strong>in</strong>e. Presently the one-proton drip-l<strong>in</strong>e is known up<br />

to mass A~180, whereas the two-proton drip-l<strong>in</strong>e is only<br />

known up to A=54.<br />

One- and two-proton emitters are spectacular examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> open quantum systems, which allow the study<br />

<strong>of</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g between bound nuclear states and the cont<strong>in</strong>uum.<br />

Furthermore, proton emitters also provide a<br />

wealth <strong>of</strong> spectroscopic <strong>in</strong>formation, test<strong>in</strong>g the validity<br />

<strong>of</strong> nuclear models beyond the drip l<strong>in</strong>e. The dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two-proton radioactivity provides an <strong>in</strong>sight<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teraction and Josephson tunnell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

nuclear matter. After the recent observation <strong>of</strong> the ground<br />

state two-proton decay <strong>of</strong> 45 Fe, the understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

physics <strong>in</strong>volved requires more detailed data on the twoproton<br />

decay <strong>of</strong> 48 Ni and 54 Zn as well as <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong><br />

heavier candidates, 59 Ge, 63 Se, and 67 Kr. In addition to<br />

the total decay energy and the partial half-life, the energy<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g between the two protons and <strong>in</strong> particular the<br />

angle between the protons should be measured.<br />

Prompt particle decay <strong>in</strong> competition with gamma<br />

decay from excited or isomeric states is a rare phenomenon.<br />

It was identified <strong>in</strong> the A~60 region and expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> some cases, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> an abrupt shape<br />

transition <strong>in</strong> nuclei with a limited Coulomb barrier. While<br />

the prompt proton decay has been known for more than<br />

a decade, recently the prompt emission <strong>of</strong> alpha particles<br />

was identified for 58 Ni. The nuclear structure <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

extracted from the analysis <strong>of</strong> this process is far from<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g understood and requires experimental as well as<br />

theoretical efforts.<br />

The most relevant nucleus ly<strong>in</strong>g at the proton dripl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is the N=Z=50 nucleus 100 Sn. It is expected that<br />

any collective phenomena present <strong>in</strong> this nucleus will<br />

be re<strong>in</strong>forced by the coherent contribution <strong>of</strong> protons<br />

and neutrons. The <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> this nucleus is very scarce. More detailed data will<br />

provide an <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to what extent shell gaps, collectivity<br />

or low-ly<strong>in</strong>g vibrational states are preserved.<br />

The studies <strong>of</strong> charged particle decay from isomeric<br />

or ground states will require efficient arrays <strong>of</strong> high resolution<br />

charged- particle detectors with discrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

capabilities, used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with large gamma-ray<br />

detector arrays. The <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> rare two-proton<br />

decay requires pictures <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual decay events<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed by employ<strong>in</strong>g novel imag<strong>in</strong>g time-projectionchambers<br />

(Figure 4).<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> the prompt particle decay can be extended<br />

to heavy nuclei by employ<strong>in</strong>g the recoil-decay tagg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

method. The <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> delayed one- and twoproton<br />

emitters is still limited by the flight time through<br />

the separator. One ambitious experimental goal is to fill<br />

the gap between the prompt and the several hundred<br />

ns delayed emission.<br />

<strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010 | 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!