Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
due to the <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>of</strong> photon and Z 0 exchange. From<br />
the measurements, the weak mix<strong>in</strong>g, or We<strong>in</strong>berg, angle<br />
at low momentum transfers can be extracted, provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
powerful constra<strong>in</strong>ts on TeV-scale physics, for example<br />
additional neutral gauge bosons, SUSY, and leptoquarks.<br />
In recent years, two experiments have been completed.<br />
The Møller scatter<strong>in</strong>g experiment E158 at SLAC agrees<br />
with the SM prediction for the weak mix<strong>in</strong>g angle with<strong>in</strong><br />
about one sigma. The NuTeV experiment, (anti)neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />
scatter<strong>in</strong>g from iron, however, deviates from the SM by<br />
about three sigma. The overall agreement <strong>of</strong> the APNC<br />
and PVeS experiments with the SM prediction for the<br />
runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the We<strong>in</strong>berg angle from the Z 0 -pole down<br />
to low energies ( Fig.4), is poor at the moment, and it is<br />
apparent that more precise experiments are called for.<br />
The Qweak experiment at JLab measures the parityviolat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
asymmetry <strong>in</strong> polarised-electron scatter<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
protons at Q 2 = 0.03 GeV 2 /c 2 . The goal is to extract the<br />
weak charge <strong>of</strong> the proton, Q W<br />
p<br />
= 1−4s<strong>in</strong> 2 θ W with a comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
statistical and systematic error <strong>of</strong> 4%, provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a 0.3% measurement <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong> 2 θ W . After the completion <strong>of</strong><br />
the Qweak experiment and the realisation <strong>of</strong> the 12 GeV<br />
JLab upgrade, two new PVeS experiments are planned.<br />
A parity-violat<strong>in</strong>g Møller scatter<strong>in</strong>g experiment at 11 GeV<br />
will measure the weak charge <strong>of</strong> the electron with much<br />
better precision. A deep-<strong>in</strong>elastic electron–proton scatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experiment will provide new <strong>in</strong>formation on the<br />
parity-violat<strong>in</strong>g electron–quark <strong>in</strong>teraction, <strong>in</strong> particular<br />
the axial-vector quark coupl<strong>in</strong>gs, which are very difficult<br />
to measure with other low-energy techniques. This<br />
experiment not only tests the electroweak sector <strong>of</strong> the<br />
SM, but it will also provide <strong>in</strong>formation on novel aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> the QCD (parton) structure <strong>of</strong> nucleons.<br />
Note that parity-violat<strong>in</strong>g elastic electron scatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from nuclei (e.g. lead) is be<strong>in</strong>g pursued at JLab. F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />
<strong>in</strong> the long-term future a high-energy polarised-electron<br />
light-ion collider could provide new opportunities<br />
to measure the weak-mix<strong>in</strong>g angle to ultra-high precision.<br />
Parity violation <strong>in</strong> hadronic systems<br />
The standard model <strong>of</strong> particle physics provides a<br />
well-established description <strong>of</strong> the fundamental weak<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction between quarks but how it manifests <strong>in</strong> the<br />
hadronic environment still rema<strong>in</strong>s enigmatic, e.g. parityviolat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
asymmetries observed <strong>in</strong> non-leptonic decays<br />
<strong>of</strong> hyperons still cannot be reconciled with theoretical<br />
expectations. Current studies to shed more light on the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terplay between weak and strong <strong>in</strong>teractions mostly<br />
rely on parity violation as an experimental filter to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
the much larger effects due to strong and<br />
electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>teractions. While peculiar enhancement<br />
effects facilitate the observation <strong>of</strong> hadronic weak<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction processes, they obscure the l<strong>in</strong>k to the<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g theory framework, for which parity violat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
asymmetries <strong>in</strong> few-nucleon systems without enhancement<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer much cleaner conditions.<br />
A recent effective field theory approach provides a<br />
model-<strong>in</strong>dependent framework to describe the weak<br />
forces between nucleons and makes close contact with<br />
QCD. However, so far only few observables <strong>in</strong> few body<br />
systems have provided non-zero results, such as the longitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />
analys<strong>in</strong>g power <strong>in</strong> pp scatter<strong>in</strong>g at Bonn, PSI<br />
and TRIUMF, and the triton asymmetry <strong>in</strong> polarised neutron<br />
capture by 6 Li at the ILL. The prospect <strong>of</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
from effective field theory accurate predictions for parity<br />
violat<strong>in</strong>g observables <strong>in</strong> hadronic few-body systems has<br />
motivated strong new efforts <strong>in</strong> the US. However, these<br />
experiments are very challeng<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the smallness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the expected asymmetry effects.<br />
Time reversal and CP violation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the quark sector<br />
If one assumes CPT to be conserved, time reversal<br />
violation and CP violation are equivalent. So far, CP violation<br />
has been observed <strong>in</strong> the neutral K and B meson<br />
systems, and is usually believed to be manifest also<br />
<strong>in</strong> the huge baryon asymmetry <strong>of</strong> our universe. While<br />
the SM, via a complex phase <strong>in</strong> the CKM matrix, perfectly<br />
describes the observed CP violation <strong>in</strong> the K 0 and<br />
B 0 systems, it completely fails, together with standard<br />
cosmology, to expla<strong>in</strong> the observed baryon asymmetry.<br />
Another CP violat<strong>in</strong>g phase is present <strong>in</strong> the SM <strong>in</strong> QCD,<br />
the so called θ-term, which is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by experiment<br />
to be very small, i.e. less than ~10 -10 . Additional sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> CP violation appear to be necessary and are naturally<br />
found <strong>in</strong> most popular extensions <strong>of</strong> the SM <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> complex phases.<br />
Searches for new CP violation, or equivalently for time<br />
reversal violation, can be pursued by more precisely<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the known CP violat<strong>in</strong>g channels or by<br />
concentrat<strong>in</strong>g on observables with negligible SM background,<br />
thereby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the sensitivity to any k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />
new effect. Examples comprise time reversal violat<strong>in</strong>g β<br />
decay correlations, effects <strong>in</strong> the neutral D-meson system<br />
and permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs).<br />
Electric dipole moments<br />
Any permanent electric dipole moment <strong>of</strong> a fundamental<br />
quantum system would violate <strong>in</strong>variance under time<br />
reversal. Experimentally, so far, no f<strong>in</strong>ite value <strong>of</strong> any<br />
such permanent EDM has been found and experiments<br />
today are not yet sensitive enough to detect the small<br />
EDMs due to the known SM contribution. They are,<br />
however, prob<strong>in</strong>g and so far exclud<strong>in</strong>g many models<br />
<strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010 | 163