Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
muon <strong>in</strong>tensities. These could be achieved for example<br />
at the <strong>Europe</strong>an Spallation Source that is due to be built<br />
<strong>in</strong> Sweden. Another particle considered for a r<strong>in</strong>g EDM<br />
experiment is the deuteron, for which a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 10 -29<br />
e cm might be achievable. Design studies, particularly<br />
on sp<strong>in</strong> dynamics <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>in</strong>g and on deuteron polarimetry<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g nuclear scatter<strong>in</strong>g, are presently be<strong>in</strong>g performed<br />
at the COSY facility <strong>in</strong> Jülich, with the aim <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a deuteron EDM experiment <strong>in</strong> the near future.<br />
Decay correlations<br />
Observables for test<strong>in</strong>g time reversal violation <strong>in</strong> particle<br />
decay or reactions can be constructed by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
appropriate vectors and axial vectors. Time reversal<br />
violation <strong>in</strong> nuclear strong <strong>in</strong>teractions can usually be<br />
addressed with more sensitivity from limits on neutron<br />
and nuclear EDMs.<br />
Important TRV observables are available <strong>in</strong> β decays<br />
<strong>of</strong> leptons and hadrons (e.g. muons, neutrons, nuclei,<br />
hyperons). Experimentally accessible are triple correlations<br />
<strong>of</strong> parent particle sp<strong>in</strong>s, J, and decay lepton<br />
momenta, p, and sp<strong>in</strong>s, σ. The triple correlation between<br />
parent sp<strong>in</strong>, β particle momentum and neutr<strong>in</strong>o momentum<br />
is conventionally referred to as the D coefficient,<br />
while the R coefficient labels the correlation between<br />
parent sp<strong>in</strong>, β particle momentum and sp<strong>in</strong>:<br />
〈J → 〉 p → e p → ν<br />
〈J → 〉 p → e<br />
D ∝ ⎯ . ⎯ × ⎯ and R ∝ → σ . e ⎯ × ⎯<br />
J E e E ν J E e<br />
The TRV contribution <strong>in</strong> D would be from a phase<br />
between vector and axial vector coupl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> R from<br />
tensor and scalar coupl<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
The best limits on D come from 19 Ne decay, D Ne =<br />
(0.1 ± 0.6) × 10 -3 (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton), and from neutron decay,<br />
D n = (0.4 ± 0.6) × 10 -3 (NIST, ILL), on R from β decays <strong>of</strong><br />
8 Li and neutrons (both PSI): R Li = (0.9±2.2)×10 -3 and R n<br />
= (0.8 ± 1.5 ± 0.5)×10 -2 .<br />
Further improvements <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>in</strong> D and R<br />
correlation experiments appear possible, both with<br />
neutrons as well as with light nuclei, eventually us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trapped radioactive atoms or ions at radioactive beam<br />
facilities.<br />
Investigat<strong>in</strong>g TRV observables <strong>in</strong> other than nucleonic<br />
systems rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest for various reasons;<br />
for example, the pure leptonic character <strong>of</strong> the muon<br />
system and the absence <strong>of</strong> electromagnetic f<strong>in</strong>al-state<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions. Superior sensitivity could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
improved positron polarimetry at exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities or<br />
via improved count<strong>in</strong>g statistics at future production<br />
facilities for muon neutr<strong>in</strong>os.<br />
CPT and Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance<br />
The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> relativity <strong>in</strong> four-dimensional space–time<br />
implies that the laws <strong>of</strong> physics are Lorentz (Po<strong>in</strong>caré)<br />
<strong>in</strong>variant, that is, they are <strong>in</strong>variant under translations,<br />
rotations, and boosts (velocity transformations). Lorentz<br />
<strong>in</strong>variance is a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> modern physics: when<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics,<br />
it leads to the framework <strong>of</strong> relativistic quantum<br />
field theory for the description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>of</strong><br />
elementary particles. Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance is at the basis<br />
not only <strong>of</strong> the SM, but also <strong>of</strong> extensions <strong>of</strong> the SM,<br />
such as supersymmetry, that are formulated <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> a local quantum field theory. Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance is<br />
<strong>in</strong>timately connected to CPT <strong>in</strong>variance: Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance<br />
is needed to prove CPT <strong>in</strong>variance <strong>in</strong> a quantum<br />
field theory, and, equivalently, CPT violation implies the<br />
violation <strong>of</strong> Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance. CPT <strong>in</strong>variance is valid<br />
<strong>in</strong> a local and causal Lorentz-<strong>in</strong>variant quantum field<br />
theory; to break it, one must give up locality, causality,<br />
and/or Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance. Numerous experiments so<br />
far have confirmed that Lorentz and CPT <strong>in</strong>variance are<br />
valid at presently accessible energies and precisions;<br />
violations, if they exist, must be very small. Nevertheless,<br />
there are excellent reasons to test their validity as exact<br />
symmetries as accurately as possible. All the symmetries<br />
<strong>of</strong> physics are based on a priori theoretical assumptions<br />
that Nature may not respect and that therefore need to<br />
Table 3. Status <strong>of</strong> electric dipole moment searches.<br />
Particle Experimental method Limit<br />
(e cm)<br />
SM value<br />
(factor to go)<br />
New physics<br />
(factor to go)<br />
electron thallium beam 1.6 x 10 -27 10 11 1<br />
muon magnetic storage r<strong>in</strong>g 1.9 x 10 -19 10 8 200<br />
neutron ultracold neutrons 2.9 x 10 -27 10 4 30<br />
proton thallium sp<strong>in</strong> resonance 3.7 x 10 -23 10 7 10 5<br />
199 Hg atom sp<strong>in</strong> precession <strong>in</strong> external E and<br />
B fields<br />
3.7 x 10 -26 10 5 various<br />
<strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010 | 165