29.12.2014 Views

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

muon <strong>in</strong>tensities. These could be achieved for example<br />

at the <strong>Europe</strong>an Spallation Source that is due to be built<br />

<strong>in</strong> Sweden. Another particle considered for a r<strong>in</strong>g EDM<br />

experiment is the deuteron, for which a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 10 -29<br />

e cm might be achievable. Design studies, particularly<br />

on sp<strong>in</strong> dynamics <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>in</strong>g and on deuteron polarimetry<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g nuclear scatter<strong>in</strong>g, are presently be<strong>in</strong>g performed<br />

at the COSY facility <strong>in</strong> Jülich, with the aim <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a deuteron EDM experiment <strong>in</strong> the near future.<br />

Decay correlations<br />

Observables for test<strong>in</strong>g time reversal violation <strong>in</strong> particle<br />

decay or reactions can be constructed by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

appropriate vectors and axial vectors. Time reversal<br />

violation <strong>in</strong> nuclear strong <strong>in</strong>teractions can usually be<br />

addressed with more sensitivity from limits on neutron<br />

and nuclear EDMs.<br />

Important TRV observables are available <strong>in</strong> β decays<br />

<strong>of</strong> leptons and hadrons (e.g. muons, neutrons, nuclei,<br />

hyperons). Experimentally accessible are triple correlations<br />

<strong>of</strong> parent particle sp<strong>in</strong>s, J, and decay lepton<br />

momenta, p, and sp<strong>in</strong>s, σ. The triple correlation between<br />

parent sp<strong>in</strong>, β particle momentum and neutr<strong>in</strong>o momentum<br />

is conventionally referred to as the D coefficient,<br />

while the R coefficient labels the correlation between<br />

parent sp<strong>in</strong>, β particle momentum and sp<strong>in</strong>:<br />

〈J → 〉 p → e p → ν<br />

〈J → 〉 p → e<br />

D ∝ ⎯ . ⎯ × ⎯ and R ∝ → σ . e ⎯ × ⎯<br />

J E e E ν J E e<br />

The TRV contribution <strong>in</strong> D would be from a phase<br />

between vector and axial vector coupl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> R from<br />

tensor and scalar coupl<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

The best limits on D come from 19 Ne decay, D Ne =<br />

(0.1 ± 0.6) × 10 -3 (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton), and from neutron decay,<br />

D n = (0.4 ± 0.6) × 10 -3 (NIST, ILL), on R from β decays <strong>of</strong><br />

8 Li and neutrons (both PSI): R Li = (0.9±2.2)×10 -3 and R n<br />

= (0.8 ± 1.5 ± 0.5)×10 -2 .<br />

Further improvements <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>in</strong> D and R<br />

correlation experiments appear possible, both with<br />

neutrons as well as with light nuclei, eventually us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trapped radioactive atoms or ions at radioactive beam<br />

facilities.<br />

Investigat<strong>in</strong>g TRV observables <strong>in</strong> other than nucleonic<br />

systems rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest for various reasons;<br />

for example, the pure leptonic character <strong>of</strong> the muon<br />

system and the absence <strong>of</strong> electromagnetic f<strong>in</strong>al-state<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Superior sensitivity could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

improved positron polarimetry at exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities or<br />

via improved count<strong>in</strong>g statistics at future production<br />

facilities for muon neutr<strong>in</strong>os.<br />

CPT and Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance<br />

The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> relativity <strong>in</strong> four-dimensional space–time<br />

implies that the laws <strong>of</strong> physics are Lorentz (Po<strong>in</strong>caré)<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant, that is, they are <strong>in</strong>variant under translations,<br />

rotations, and boosts (velocity transformations). Lorentz<br />

<strong>in</strong>variance is a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> modern physics: when<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics,<br />

it leads to the framework <strong>of</strong> relativistic quantum<br />

field theory for the description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>of</strong><br />

elementary particles. Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance is at the basis<br />

not only <strong>of</strong> the SM, but also <strong>of</strong> extensions <strong>of</strong> the SM,<br />

such as supersymmetry, that are formulated <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> a local quantum field theory. Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance is<br />

<strong>in</strong>timately connected to CPT <strong>in</strong>variance: Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance<br />

is needed to prove CPT <strong>in</strong>variance <strong>in</strong> a quantum<br />

field theory, and, equivalently, CPT violation implies the<br />

violation <strong>of</strong> Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance. CPT <strong>in</strong>variance is valid<br />

<strong>in</strong> a local and causal Lorentz-<strong>in</strong>variant quantum field<br />

theory; to break it, one must give up locality, causality,<br />

and/or Lorentz <strong>in</strong>variance. Numerous experiments so<br />

far have confirmed that Lorentz and CPT <strong>in</strong>variance are<br />

valid at presently accessible energies and precisions;<br />

violations, if they exist, must be very small. Nevertheless,<br />

there are excellent reasons to test their validity as exact<br />

symmetries as accurately as possible. All the symmetries<br />

<strong>of</strong> physics are based on a priori theoretical assumptions<br />

that Nature may not respect and that therefore need to<br />

Table 3. Status <strong>of</strong> electric dipole moment searches.<br />

Particle Experimental method Limit<br />

(e cm)<br />

SM value<br />

(factor to go)<br />

New physics<br />

(factor to go)<br />

electron thallium beam 1.6 x 10 -27 10 11 1<br />

muon magnetic storage r<strong>in</strong>g 1.9 x 10 -19 10 8 200<br />

neutron ultracold neutrons 2.9 x 10 -27 10 4 30<br />

proton thallium sp<strong>in</strong> resonance 3.7 x 10 -23 10 7 10 5<br />

199 Hg atom sp<strong>in</strong> precession <strong>in</strong> external E and<br />

B fields<br />

3.7 x 10 -26 10 5 various<br />

<strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010 | 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!