29.12.2014 Views

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5 Fundamental Interactions<br />

The CP violation search will require neutr<strong>in</strong>o beams<br />

with the highest possible <strong>in</strong>tensities, t<strong>in</strong>y <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic backgrounds<br />

and very good control <strong>of</strong> systematic errors. The<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> long term oscillation experiments is to address<br />

leptonic CP violation, the neutr<strong>in</strong>o hierarchy and small<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the third neutr<strong>in</strong>o mix<strong>in</strong>g angle. Three possibilities<br />

can be envisaged: super-beams, beta-beams and<br />

neutr<strong>in</strong>o factories. Super- beams are neutr<strong>in</strong>o beams<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g from conventional sources (pion and muon<br />

decays) pushed to their ultimate <strong>in</strong>tensity. Neutr<strong>in</strong>o factories<br />

are based on the production, acceleration and<br />

storage <strong>of</strong> muons to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tense muon and electron<br />

(anti)neutr<strong>in</strong>o beams.<br />

The beta-beam concept, proposed by Zucchelli, is a<br />

new method for the production <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tense neutr<strong>in</strong>o beams<br />

based on the β decay <strong>of</strong> boosted radioactive ions. Such<br />

beams are pure <strong>in</strong> flavour (only ν e or ⎺νe depend<strong>in</strong>g on the β<br />

decay<strong>in</strong>g ion) and have well known fluxes. In the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

scenario the beta-beam basel<strong>in</strong>e is hosted at CERN.<br />

The ions are produced through the ISOL technique and<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> a storage r<strong>in</strong>g. When they decay, they produce<br />

a neutr<strong>in</strong>o beam po<strong>in</strong>ted to a far large-size detector<br />

located <strong>in</strong> an enlarged Frejus Underground Laboratory<br />

to compare ν e → ν µ with ⎺νe → ⎺ νµ . The megaton size<br />

Cherenkov detector (about 20 times Super-Kamiokande)<br />

would be a multipurpose detector for the search <strong>of</strong> CP<br />

violation and proton decay, as well as the observation <strong>of</strong><br />

(relic) supernova neutr<strong>in</strong>os. The (3σ) discovery limit for<br />

s<strong>in</strong> 2 2θ 13 > 3 × 10 -4 covers a large fraction <strong>of</strong> all δ values<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g the beta-beam option a very competitive strategy.<br />

As far as the hierarchy is concerned, the neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

factory can identify the mass hierarchy through matter<br />

effects, while the beta-beam can use a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

with atmospheric data <strong>in</strong> the same detector if the third<br />

neutr<strong>in</strong>o angle is large.<br />

Note that a low energy beta-beam facility has also<br />

been proposed with the purpose <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest for nuclear physics,<br />

for the study <strong>of</strong> fundamental <strong>in</strong>teractions and for corecollapse<br />

supernova physics. A feasibility study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al beta-beam basel<strong>in</strong>e has been performed with<strong>in</strong><br />

the EURISOL Design Study (FP6, 2005-2009). Clearly a<br />

key issue is to reach the required ion <strong>in</strong>tensities. Further<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation on high ion production techniques for the<br />

isotopes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest is crucial.<br />

As far as a comparison among the facilities is<br />

concerned, if s<strong>in</strong> 2 2θ 13 > 0.02 (large) the superbeam, betabeam<br />

and neutr<strong>in</strong>o factory have similar sensitivity to the<br />

Dirac phase. For values <strong>of</strong> 5 × 10 -4 < s<strong>in</strong> 2 2θ 13 < 0.02 the<br />

superbeams are outperformed by the beta-beam and<br />

the neutr<strong>in</strong>o factory. Only the optimised neutr<strong>in</strong>o factory<br />

can reach values <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong> 2 2θ 13 smaller than 5 × 10 -4 , while<br />

the optimised beta-beam and the conservative neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

factory option have a comparable performance.<br />

Neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses<br />

Neutr<strong>in</strong>o oscillation experiments have provided clear evidence<br />

for the neutr<strong>in</strong>os to be massive particles. However,<br />

the fact that they turn out to be lighter by at least 6<br />

orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude than any charged fermion is difficult<br />

to ascribe simply to much smaller Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

to the Higgs. It is therefore much more reasonable to<br />

assume that neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses are based on so-called<br />

Majorana mass terms, which are only allowed for the<br />

neutral neutr<strong>in</strong>os. The seesaw mechanism would be a<br />

natural explanation for the smallness <strong>of</strong> neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses,<br />

but it would require new physics beyond the Standard<br />

Model. Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses would allow a<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction to be made between different theories.<br />

Unfortunately, neutr<strong>in</strong>o oscillation experiments provide<br />

us with the differences <strong>of</strong> the squared neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses<br />

Δm 2 ij and cannot determ<strong>in</strong>e the sign <strong>of</strong> Δm 2 ij nor the absolute<br />

neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses. Still, once one neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass has<br />

been determ<strong>in</strong>ed by different means, the other neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

masses could be reconstructed us<strong>in</strong>g the values from<br />

neutr<strong>in</strong>o oscillation experiments. The absolute neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

mass has strong consequences for astrophysics and<br />

cosmology as well as for nuclear and particle physics.<br />

Therefore, an absolute determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> one neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

mass is one <strong>of</strong> the most important next steps <strong>in</strong> neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

physics. In cosmology an upper limit <strong>of</strong> Σm i < 0.61 eV/c 2<br />

on the sum <strong>of</strong> the three neutr<strong>in</strong>o masses has been<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the size <strong>of</strong> fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the microwave<br />

background at small scales. This is, however, to some<br />

extent model- and analysis-dependent. It is expected<br />

that the data from the recently launched PLANCK satellite<br />

will allow improvement to the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the neutr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

mass to the 100 meV/c 2 range with<strong>in</strong> the next decade.<br />

Other approaches are direct mass measurements and<br />

searches for neutr<strong>in</strong>oless double β decay (0νββ).<br />

Direct mass measurements<br />

Direct neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based on the<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>ematics <strong>of</strong> weak decays, the signature<br />

<strong>of</strong> a non-zero neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass be<strong>in</strong>g a t<strong>in</strong>y<br />

modification <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> the β electrons near its<br />

endpo<strong>in</strong>t. This allows determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the “average<br />

electron neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass”<br />

with<br />

this <strong>in</strong>coherent sum not be<strong>in</strong>g sensitive to phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

neutr<strong>in</strong>o mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix. For optimal sensitivity β emitters<br />

with low endpo<strong>in</strong>t energy are favoured. Two different<br />

isotopes, tritium ( 3 H) and 187 Re, are suited for these<br />

experiments. Tritium (with an endpo<strong>in</strong>t energy <strong>of</strong> 18.6<br />

keV and a half-life <strong>of</strong> 12.3 y) β decay experiments have<br />

been performed <strong>in</strong> the search for the neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass for<br />

more than 50 years, yield<strong>in</strong>g a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 2 eV/c 2 by<br />

the experiments at Ma<strong>in</strong>z and Troitsk. The KATRIN<br />

154 | <strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!