Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
Perspectives of Nuclear Physics in Europe - European Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Highly-charged ions<br />
The fourth direction <strong>in</strong> high precision tests <strong>of</strong> QED is<br />
research with middle range and even heavy ions <strong>in</strong> the<br />
highest charge states, i.e. bare ions, hydrogen-like ions<br />
or few-electron systems. Calculations have recently<br />
achieved such a degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy that these systems<br />
now <strong>of</strong>fer a test<strong>in</strong>g ground <strong>of</strong> QED <strong>in</strong> the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> strong electric fields. This needs equally accurate<br />
experiments, which <strong>in</strong>volve charge breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> electron<br />
beam ion traps (EBIT) or electron stripp<strong>in</strong>g at relativistic<br />
energies <strong>in</strong> accelerator facilities, cool<strong>in</strong>g and stor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
ion traps or storage r<strong>in</strong>gs. Such experiments will also<br />
benefit from the recent development <strong>of</strong> high-power<br />
lasers such as PHELIX at GSI or <strong>in</strong>tensive free electron<br />
lasers. Upcom<strong>in</strong>g facilities will provide high-flux photon<br />
beams with energies up to the keV region enabl<strong>in</strong>g, for<br />
example, fundamental photon-atom <strong>in</strong>teraction studies<br />
such as precision spectroscopy <strong>of</strong> highly charged ions.<br />
Further on, experiments on stored and cooled beams <strong>of</strong><br />
heavy ions <strong>in</strong> the highest charge states up to uranium<br />
U 92+ (where the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy becomes comparable<br />
to the electron mass), for example the precise measurement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ground-state Lamb shift, have already<br />
been conducted <strong>in</strong> the Experimental Storage R<strong>in</strong>g ESR<br />
at GSI. The HITRAP facility, a Penn<strong>in</strong>g trap setup for<br />
accumulat<strong>in</strong>g and stor<strong>in</strong>g highly charged ions up to bare<br />
U 92+, will allow for high-accuracy measurements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lamb shift, the ground-state hyperf<strong>in</strong>e splitt<strong>in</strong>g, or the<br />
g-factor <strong>of</strong> the bound electron <strong>in</strong> an ion <strong>of</strong> the very same<br />
isotope with up to four electrons. Here, nuclear structure<br />
effects can be elim<strong>in</strong>ated to a large extent and high-<br />
Z QED can be tested without major distortion by the<br />
nuclear size. This opens up an alternative route to an<br />
accurate determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>e structure constant.<br />
Also important is the possibility <strong>of</strong> accurately measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the magnetic moment <strong>of</strong> a heavy ion (at HITRAP <strong>in</strong> GSI).<br />
This may allow one <strong>of</strong> the most accurate determ<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nuclear magnetic moment, free <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />
structure uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, and free <strong>of</strong> theoretical uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />
<strong>in</strong> the shield<strong>in</strong>g and hyperf<strong>in</strong>e constants. This<br />
is <strong>in</strong> contrast to standard determ<strong>in</strong>ations through the<br />
hyperf<strong>in</strong>e splitt<strong>in</strong>g or NMR technique, where the atomic<br />
structure calculations, not consider<strong>in</strong>g QED effects,<br />
are not accurate enough to reach a similar precision<br />
for nuclear magnetic moments. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the unexpected<br />
recent observations <strong>of</strong> non-exponential orbital electron<br />
capture decays <strong>of</strong> hydrogen-like 140 Pr and 142 Pm ions<br />
(‘GSI oscillations’), which has not yet found a conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />
explanation, deserves to be verified.<br />
Many-electron atoms<br />
In the fifth direction, QED effects are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
for many electron atoms <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> accurate<br />
energy levels, transition rates, isotope shifts and to<br />
test predictions <strong>of</strong> the Standard Model for the weak<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction between electrons and nuclei as described<br />
<strong>in</strong> the previous section. However, the current development<br />
<strong>of</strong> accurate atomic structure calculations is less<br />
than satisfactory. There is not yet any implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> QED theory <strong>in</strong> multi-electron atoms that accounts<br />
at the same time for correlations and the electron selfenergies.<br />
Although this problem has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
for a long time, so far no systematic approach has been<br />
implemented <strong>in</strong> the atomic structure codes, so that an<br />
accurate treatment <strong>of</strong> electron correlations and QED<br />
effects <strong>in</strong> many electron atoms deserves further <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, we mention speculative ideas, that fundamental<br />
constants such as α are not constant over the<br />
cosmological time, or even on the scale <strong>of</strong> a couple <strong>of</strong><br />
years. These ideas are be<strong>in</strong>g verified at many laboratories,<br />
for example at NIST by a comparison <strong>of</strong> Al + versus<br />
Hg + , the most accurate s<strong>in</strong>gle-ion optical clocks. As<br />
a result α . / α cannot be larger than 10 -17 /year, which<br />
is so far the most str<strong>in</strong>gent limit on the possible time<br />
variation <strong>of</strong> α.<br />
QCD and hadronic atoms<br />
Exotic hadronic atoms (see also the chapter on Hadron<br />
<strong>Physics</strong>) have long been used to study the strong <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
between the exotic particle and the nucleus at – as<br />
compared to scatter<strong>in</strong>g experiments – zero energy, i.e.<br />
at threshold. The lowest energy atomic states experience<br />
a shift and broaden<strong>in</strong>g due to the strong <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the exotic hadronic particle and the nucleus, which<br />
are usually measured by precision X-ray spectroscopy.<br />
Activities with pionic atoms at PSI have been successfully<br />
completed, while the DIRAC experiment at CERN is<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g pionium ππ and πK atoms. Most activity is<br />
concentrated on kaonic atoms and kaonic nuclear bound<br />
states, <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> at LN Frascati and GSI-Darmstadt, and<br />
<strong>in</strong> Japan at KEK and <strong>in</strong> future at J-PARC. Exotic atoms<br />
with more exotic particles like Σ or Ξ are also planned at<br />
J-PARC. Antiprotonic light atoms have been <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
previously at LEAR, but more studies are planned <strong>in</strong> the<br />
future at FLAIR.<br />
Pionic atoms<br />
The strong <strong>in</strong>teraction at low energies is described by<br />
non-perturbative QCD. In the case <strong>of</strong> pionic atoms,<br />
chiral perturbation theory is applicable and the <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
between the Goldstone bosons, the pions, is<br />
most easy to calculate. This makes systems like ππ and<br />
πK most attractive from the theoretical po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
Experimentally, the lifetime <strong>of</strong> these atoms <strong>in</strong> matter –<br />
<strong>Perspectives</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Physics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> – NuPECC Long Range Plan 2010 | 169