Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Roman Orzanski<br />
Possibly <strong>the</strong> first FoE group in <strong>Australia</strong> was<br />
that at Adelaide University. The early seventies<br />
were times <strong>of</strong> social upheaval, and many<br />
ideas were imported from overseas. In 1971, a<br />
University group called Social Action produced<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> major articles which appeared in<br />
<strong>the</strong> campus newspaper, On Dit, about waste,<br />
pollution, and <strong>the</strong> environment.<br />
Social Action had subgroups and was active<br />
in a number <strong>of</strong> areas, yet <strong>the</strong>re was enough<br />
interest to also form a <strong>Friends</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong><br />
Group. Information from overseas about<br />
happenings on <strong>the</strong> environmental front was<br />
circulated and soon <strong>the</strong>re was a core <strong>of</strong><br />
students concerned about <strong>the</strong> environment.<br />
From <strong>the</strong> first, FoE called itself a radical<br />
ecology group.<br />
By March 1972 regular meetings <strong>of</strong> FoE were<br />
held under <strong>the</strong> auspices <strong>of</strong> Social Action/<br />
Abschol. A seminar was held entitled “Is<br />
technology a blueprint for destruction” This<br />
concern with <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> technology was<br />
an important part <strong>of</strong> questioning <strong>the</strong> purpose<br />
<strong>of</strong> universities. The proceedings were later<br />
published for distribution.<br />
The First Campaign<br />
Appropriately enough, <strong>the</strong> first target for<br />
FoE was waste from packaging and <strong>the</strong> litter<br />
created by disposable containers. The concern<br />
with packaging quickly lead to <strong>the</strong> first King<br />
<strong>of</strong> Krap award, to Coca Cola. The award was<br />
announced in On Dit on April 11, and students<br />
were invited to collect empty coke cans and<br />
join in a march to <strong>the</strong> Coke factory on <strong>the</strong><br />
Friday.<br />
About 300 people took part. The <strong>of</strong>fending<br />
items were returned, and <strong>the</strong> award presented<br />
to Coke. The threat to target polluters and<br />
undo <strong>the</strong>ir careful public relations work had<br />
an amazing effect upon <strong>the</strong> large packaging<br />
companies:<br />
...................................................................................................................................................................................................<br />
I found it very heartening to realise that<br />
within hours <strong>of</strong> somebody wandering around<br />
Adelaide University and seeing a notice<br />
stuck up saying FoE were going to organise a<br />
demonstration against Coca Cola in 10 days<br />
time and someone (ei<strong>the</strong>r an employee, or a<br />
child <strong>of</strong> an employee <strong>of</strong> Coca Cola) rang Coke<br />
and within hours 20 top executives <strong>of</strong> six <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Australia</strong>ʼs largest companies all round <strong>the</strong><br />
country were panicking. Thatʼs an indication <strong>of</strong><br />
what it was like. People were flying to and fro.<br />
They didnʼt know what to do. They flew me<br />
over to Adelaide to see if I could head <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong><br />
demonstration.<br />
There were seven options open to <strong>the</strong>m -<br />
ranging from one extreme from doing nothing<br />
at all, to at <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r extreme preventing <strong>the</strong><br />
march from ever leaving <strong>the</strong> University - and<br />
that was an option which <strong>the</strong>y obviously<br />
regarded as just being perfectly normal within<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir capacity. They eventually decided to<br />
allow <strong>the</strong> march to occur and not to call<br />
<strong>the</strong> cops, but just make sure <strong>the</strong> cops were<br />
hovering in <strong>the</strong> background on <strong>the</strong> grounds that<br />
<strong>the</strong>yʼve got a brand new plant on a major road<br />
out <strong>of</strong> town with acreage <strong>of</strong> glass on <strong>the</strong> front,<br />
which is operating eight hours a day, so three<br />
quarters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire week its unmanned.<br />
(Gabriel Lafitte, a former employee <strong>of</strong> Image<br />
<strong>Australia</strong>, which handled <strong>the</strong> steel can account,<br />
Interview in On Dit 1973)<br />
A few weeks later after <strong>the</strong> visit to Coke, a<br />
similar march visited Parliament House, where<br />
cans were left on <strong>the</strong> steps and deputation went<br />
to chat to Glen Broomhill, <strong>the</strong>n Minister for <strong>the</strong><br />
Environment.<br />
Steel Can Blues: FoE vs. BHP<br />
After <strong>the</strong> assault on Coke, <strong>the</strong> Steel Can<br />
People, who were trying to promote a<br />
community conscious, responsible image for<br />
BHP (as a producer <strong>of</strong> steel cans), decided to<br />
try to tame FoE. They invited <strong>the</strong>m to observe<br />
recycling operations and gave <strong>the</strong>m $3,900 to<br />
make a film about recycling. Ultimately, <strong>the</strong><br />
film was a damning indictment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
steel can scam.<br />
FoE 30 <strong>Years</strong> 99