Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Thirty Years of Creative Resistance - Friends of the Earth Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................<br />
Peace flotilla boat, protesting visits by US warships, Western <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> early 1980s plans to place nuclear<br />
weapons in NATO countries created an<br />
enormous resistance across Western<br />
Europe that reverberated here in<br />
<strong>Australia</strong>. It can be argued that <strong>the</strong> older<br />
anti uranium movement and <strong>the</strong> rising<br />
disarmament movements were similar and<br />
inter-connected, yet essentially different.<br />
In this simplistic analysis it can be said<br />
that FoE was more grounded in <strong>the</strong> antiuranium<br />
movement.<br />
FoE’s most significant contribution<br />
to disarmament was based on <strong>the</strong><br />
understanding that nuclear weapons<br />
needed to be sourced from radioactive<br />
materials (uranium) and <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />
contribution to world peace that <strong>Australia</strong>ns<br />
could make was to break <strong>the</strong>ir involvement<br />
in <strong>the</strong> nuclear fuel cycle. Hence FoE’s<br />
campaign work aimed to halt <strong>the</strong> mining<br />
and export <strong>of</strong> uranium from <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />
The Hawke government was elected in<br />
1983 on <strong>the</strong> back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tasmanian ‘no<br />
dams’ campaign. While initially proactive<br />
on a range <strong>of</strong> environmental issues, its<br />
policy was more mixed on <strong>the</strong> question<br />
<strong>of</strong> uranium mining. There was discussion<br />
at <strong>the</strong> FoEA national meeting in 1984<br />
about <strong>the</strong> most effective way to influence<br />
<strong>the</strong> party. Some felt that <strong>the</strong> best course<br />
was to become involved in lobbying<br />
ALP branches in order to help maintain<br />
grassroots opposition to uranium and to<br />
pressure <strong>the</strong> party leadership into actually<br />
implementing existing policy. Hawke was<br />
supportive <strong>of</strong> an extension <strong>of</strong> uranium<br />
mining and everyone knew <strong>the</strong>y faced an<br />
uphill battle to stop <strong>the</strong> looming expansion<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />
In late 1983, barely nine months after<br />
it had been elected, Federal Cabinet<br />
voted to allow <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Olympic Dam mine at Roxby Downs in<br />
South <strong>Australia</strong> and <strong>the</strong> continuation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Ranger mine in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory<br />
(NT). This marked a departure from what<br />
many believed was stated in ALP policy<br />
– <strong>the</strong> phasing out <strong>of</strong> existing uranium<br />
mines and a ban on <strong>the</strong> establishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> new ones. Blockades followed, at<br />
Honeymoon in SA in 1982 and Roxby<br />
Downs, in 1983 and ‘84, organised by an<br />
umbrella grouping called <strong>the</strong> Coalition for<br />
a Nuclear Free <strong>Australia</strong> (CNFA). These<br />
actions concentrated on ‘hindering and<br />
frustrating’ work at <strong>the</strong> mine, in order to<br />
delay completion and to raise community<br />
awareness.<br />
FoE 30 <strong>Years</strong> 34