Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church
Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church
Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Interpreters (1912); Out <strong>of</strong> My Life <strong>and</strong> Thought (1931); The Mysticism <strong>of</strong> St Paul<br />
(1931): Paul ... did not desire to know Christ after the flesh.... Those who want to find<br />
a way from the preaching <strong>of</strong> Jesus to early <strong>Christian</strong>ity are conscious <strong>of</strong> the peculiar<br />
difficulties raised.... Paul shows us with what complete indifference the earthly life <strong>of</strong><br />
Jesus was regarded by primary <strong>Christian</strong>ity. || The system <strong>of</strong> the Apostle <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Gentiles st<strong>and</strong>s over against the teaching <strong>of</strong> Jesus as something <strong>of</strong> an entirely<br />
different character, <strong>and</strong> does not create the impression <strong>of</strong> having arisen out <strong>of</strong> it.... It<br />
is impossible for a Hellenized Paulinism to subsist alongside <strong>of</strong> a primitive<br />
<strong>Christian</strong>ity which shared the Jewish eschatological expectations.... To the problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> Paulinism belong ... questions which have not yet found a solution:... the relation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Apostle to the historical Jesus ... <strong>and</strong> towards the [Mosaic] Law.... He does not<br />
appeal to the Master even where it might seem inevitable to do so.... It is as though<br />
he held that between the present world-period <strong>and</strong> that in which Jesus lived <strong>and</strong><br />
taught there exists no link <strong>of</strong> connection.... What Jesus thought about the matter is ...<br />
indifferent to him.... Critics [have] dem<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>of</strong> theology pro<strong>of</strong> that the canonical<br />
Paul <strong>and</strong> his Epistles belonged to early <strong>Christian</strong>ity; <strong>and</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> was justified. ||<br />
The rapid diffusion <strong>of</strong> Paul's ideas can be attributed to his belief that the death <strong>of</strong><br />
Christ signified the end <strong>of</strong> the [Mosaic] Law. In the course <strong>of</strong> one or two generations<br />
this concept became the common property <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Christian</strong> faith, although it stood in<br />
contradiction to the tradition teaching represented by the Apostles at Jerusalem. ||<br />
What is the significance for our faith <strong>and</strong> for our religious life, <strong>of</strong> the fact that the<br />
Gospel <strong>of</strong> Paul is different from the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Jesus?... The attitude which Paul<br />
himself takes up towards the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Jesus is that he does not repeat it in the<br />
words <strong>of</strong> Jesus, <strong>and</strong> does not appeal to its authority.... The fateful thing is that the<br />
Greek, the Catholic <strong>and</strong> the Protestant theologies all contain the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Paul in a<br />
form which does not continue the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Jesus, but displaces it.<br />
‘Abdu’l-Bahá (son <strong>of</strong> Bahá’u’lláh), Some Answered Questions (1908): Paul<br />
permitted even the eating <strong>of</strong> strangled animals, those sacrificed to idols, <strong>and</strong> blood,<br />
<strong>and</strong> only maintained the prohibition <strong>of</strong> fornication. So in chapter 4, verse 14 <strong>of</strong> his<br />
Epistle to the Romans.... Also Titus, chapter 1, verse 15.... Now [according to Paul]<br />
this change, these alterations <strong>and</strong> this abrogation are due to the impossibility <strong>of</strong><br />
comparing the time <strong>of</strong> Christ with that <strong>of</strong> Moses. The conditions <strong>and</strong> requirements in<br />
the latter period were entirely changed <strong>and</strong> altered. The former laws were, therefore,<br />
abrogated.<br />
143