11.11.2012 Views

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lived <strong>and</strong> died as a Jew.... Fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the [Mosaic] Law was essential.... The<br />

doctrine that Paul taught was new. He rejected the Law (as Jesus had never<br />

done),... <strong>and</strong> this was to shatter the mould <strong>of</strong> Jewish thought within which the faith<br />

had been born.<br />

James M. Robinson, The Nag Hammadi Codices (1977): The New Testament<br />

<strong>Gospels</strong> present the resurrected Christ as having a body that appears to be a<br />

human body— he is taken for a gardener, or for a traveler to Emmaus; he eats; his<br />

wounds can be touched.... Paul insists again <strong>and</strong> again that, although he was not a<br />

disciple during Jesus' lifetime, he did witness a genuine appearance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resurrected Christ But his picture <strong>of</strong> a resurrection ‘body’ is a bright light, a heavenly<br />

‘body’ like a sun, star or planet, not like an earthly body. So the book <strong>of</strong> Acts, while<br />

recounting in detail Paul's encounter with Jesus as a blinding light, presents it as if it<br />

were hardly more than a ‘conversion’. For the author [<strong>of</strong> Acts] places it well outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> resurrection appearances, which he had limited to forty days.<br />

Edward Schillebeeckx, Christ (1977): There is a difference between the<br />

theology <strong>of</strong> the early Jewish <strong>Christian</strong> congregations in Jerusalem which are<br />

oriented on Jesus <strong>of</strong> Nazareth, <strong>and</strong> Pauline theology, which knows only ‘the<br />

crucified’.<br />

Mircea Eliade, History <strong>of</strong> Beliefs <strong>and</strong> Religious Ideas (1978): Paul would have to<br />

be seen as fatally opposed to the Judeo-<strong>Christian</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem, ... a conflict <strong>of</strong><br />

which Paul <strong>and</strong> the Acts (Gal 2:7-10, Acts 15:29) give contradictory versions.<br />

Barbara Tuchman, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century (1978): Of all<br />

mankind's ideas, the equating <strong>of</strong> sex with sin has left the greatest train <strong>of</strong> trouble....<br />

In <strong>Christian</strong> theology, via St Paul, it conferred permanent guilt on mankind.... Its<br />

sexual context was largely formulated by St Augustine, whose spiritual wrestlings set<br />

<strong>Christian</strong> dogma thereafter in opposition to man's most powerful instinct.<br />

<strong>Thomas</strong> Maras, The Contradictions in the New Testament (1979): In<br />

disagreement with [Matthew <strong>and</strong> Luke], who wish him to be a direct Son <strong>of</strong> God,<br />

Paul says to us [in Rom 1:3-4] that in the flesh Jesus is the descendent <strong>of</strong> David,<br />

<strong>and</strong> only in power is the Son <strong>of</strong> God.<br />

Patrick Henry, New Directions in New Testament Study (1979): There remains<br />

in the popular mind a strong suspicion ... that Paul corrupted <strong>Christian</strong>ity (or even<br />

founded a different religion).... Jesus [was] a teacher in the mainstream <strong>of</strong> Jewish<br />

prophetic piety,... while Paul ... takes the irrevocable step away from Judaism <strong>of</strong><br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!