15.01.2015 Views

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 2<br />

RAYMOND GEORGE ROSS<br />

Date of offence: 27 August 2004<br />

Date of prosecution:<br />

Magistrate:<br />

Plea:<br />

4 October <strong>2005</strong> at Sunshine Magistrates’ Court<br />

His Honour Magistrate Jones<br />

Guilty<br />

The defendant was employed as a machine operator and in July 2001 suffered an injury. His<br />

WorkCover claim was accepted and he commenced receiving weekly payments.<br />

Investigations disclosed that between 29 July and 20 August 2004, the defendant was employed<br />

and was carrying out pre-delivery cleaning of new coaches. On 27 August, he obtained from his<br />

doctor a WorkCover Certificate of Capacity that certified he was totally unfit for all duties and<br />

signed the declaration that he had not been engaged in any form of employment since his last<br />

certificate was issued.<br />

Breach: Section 249(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985.<br />

Result: Without conviction adjourned undertaking (12 months) and ordered to pay $200 to the<br />

Court Fund.<br />

KIM NARELLE SCHROEDER<br />

Date of offence: 14 October 1999<br />

Date of prosecution:<br />

Magistrate:<br />

Plea:<br />

17 June <strong>2005</strong> at Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court<br />

Her Honour Magistrate Crowe<br />

Not guilty<br />

The defendant was employed as a sales person. On 3 February 1997, in the course of her<br />

employment the defendant was injured in a motor vehicle accident. The defendant’s WorkCover<br />

claim was accepted on 8 July 1997. Although initially incapacitated for all work, the defendant<br />

eventually returned to work with her pre-injury employer on modified duties. She eventually left<br />

her pre-injury employer, but continued to receive weekly compensation payments. The defendant’s<br />

entitlement to weekly compensation payments was subsequently terminated around the beginning<br />

of April 1999.<br />

In August 1999, the defendant’s entitlement to weekly payments was reinstated and backdated to<br />

the date of termination following an application to the Accident Compensation Conciliation Service.<br />

The defendant continued to receive weekly payments until an investigation in late 2000 by the<br />

Compliance Branch of the VWA discovered the defendant had returned to work in partnership as a<br />

florist. The florist was registered as a business in March 1999.<br />

Breach: Section 248 (31 charges) and section 249(1) (36 charges) of the Accident Compensation<br />

Act 1985.<br />

Result: Convicted and fined $5,000. Suspended sentence of imprisonment (six months,<br />

suspended for two years) and ordered to pay compensation of $32,376.26 plus $35,340 costs.<br />

100PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!