Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HEALTH AND SAFETY PROSECUTIONS<br />
CRUISE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD<br />
Date of offence: 18 June 2001<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Judge:<br />
Plea:<br />
3 May <strong>2005</strong> at Melbourne County Court<br />
His Honour Judge Punshon<br />
Not guilty<br />
On 18 June 2001 in North Dandenong, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed employees of the defendant<br />
working from an incomplete scaffold that had an unrestricted fall distance in excess of four metres.<br />
On 11 July 2001 in Croydon, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed employees of the defendant working<br />
from an insecure scaffold that had only single planks, no handrails, no kickboards and no safe<br />
means of access or egress. The inspector also formed the opinion that the instruction, training and<br />
supervision of employees were inadequate.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) and sections 21(1) & (2)(e) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: Nolle prosequi entered by the Office of Public <strong>Prosecutions</strong> after the company went<br />
into liquidation.<br />
DALVEDO PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CANTERBURY TYRE AND MAG SUPAMART PTY LTD)<br />
Date of offence: 13 January 2004<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
30 November <strong>2005</strong> at Dandenong Magistrates’ Court<br />
His Honour Magistrate Batt<br />
Guilty<br />
On 13 January 2004 at the Bayswater workplace of Dalvedo Pty Ltd, an employee was repairing a<br />
vehicle on a hoist when it fell from the hoist.<br />
There were no safety lock nuts (which cost about $10) to lock the arms of the hoist in place. The<br />
hoist had not been serviced since October 2002.<br />
The injuries sustained by the employee were significant.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: Convicted and fined $15,000.<br />
PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong><br />
25