Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 2<br />
WILLIAM WHYTE<br />
Date of offence: 4 September 2002<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
8 March <strong>2005</strong> at Moe Magistrates’ Court<br />
Her Honour Magistrate Spooner<br />
Guilty<br />
In February 2002, William Whyte was employed as an electrician. He reported suffering an injury,<br />
but was able to continue working. Between July and August 2002, he was issued with WorkCover<br />
Certificates of Capacity certifying him fit for modified duties; and from August 2002, he was<br />
issued with a WorkCover Certificate of Capacity certifying him unfit for work. In August 2002, the<br />
defendant lodged a WorkCover claim which was accepted and he commenced receiving weekly<br />
compensation payments.<br />
An investigation revealed that the defendant was the director of a business and that he worked as a<br />
crowd controller for two days in October 2002 and two days in December 2002. Since August 2002,<br />
the defendant had declared that he had not been engaged in any form of employment.<br />
Breach: Section 248 (six charges) and section 249(1) (six charges) of the Accident Compensation<br />
Act 1985.<br />
Result: Without conviction adjourned undertaking (12 months) and ordered to pay $4,542<br />
compensation plus $400 costs and $1,200 to the Court Fund.<br />
WINDSOR HOTELS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD<br />
Date of alleged offence: 22 July 2003<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
7 September <strong>2005</strong> at Melbourne Magistrates’ Court<br />
His Honour Magistrate Hodgens<br />
Not Guilty<br />
An employee of the defendant submitted a WorkCover claim on 10 June 2003. The claim was<br />
rejected. On 20 July 2003 the claimant lodged a Request for Conciliation. On 22 July the defendant<br />
summarily dismissed the claimant.<br />
Breach: Section 242(3)(b)(i); section 242(3)(b)(ii); and section 242(3)(b)(iii) of the Accident<br />
Compensation Act 1985.<br />
Result: Charges dismissed.<br />
104PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>