Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 1<br />
HOIST HYDRAULICS (VIC) PTY LTD<br />
Date of offence: 11 November 2004<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
9 December <strong>2005</strong> at Ringwood Magistrates’ Court<br />
His Honour Magistrate La Rosa<br />
Guilty<br />
On 11 November 2004, a metal trade’s assistant employed by Hoist Hydraulics (Vic) Pty Ltd was<br />
operating a machine known as a ‘rumbler’ that removes rough edges from cut metal components<br />
by rotating them. The employee had been instructed that because the on/off button did not work,<br />
he was to start and stop the machine by connecting and disconnecting the three-phase plug and<br />
extension lead that led to the machine. The extension lead was connected to a wall switch which<br />
was 30 to 40 paces away from the machine and in a position from which an operator could not see<br />
the machine.<br />
Whilst operating the machine the employee suffered an electric shock.<br />
The rumbler had been manufactured in-house several years earlier and was unsafe in the<br />
following respects:<br />
• it did not comply with Australian Standards regarding safeguarding of machinery;<br />
• numerous dangerous parts protruded from the machine, including the hinges and latches<br />
supporting the door, which created an entanglement hazard;<br />
• the hinges securing the door of the rumbler were cracked, creating a crushing hazard;<br />
• the rumbler’s on/off switch was broken;<br />
• there was no emergency stop button fitted;<br />
• the machine did not comply with Australian Standards regarding electrical installations;<br />
• the three-phase supply lead that fed power to the starter was frayed and damaged;<br />
• bare copper conductors were visible in the brown and blue active conductors;<br />
• the three phase plug connected to the supply lead for the machine showed signs of electrical arcing;<br />
• no risk assessment had been undertaken on it; and<br />
• employees were not provided with adequate instruction, information, training or supervision in<br />
regard to the risks associated with its operation.<br />
The defendant company did not notify the VWA of the incident. The incident came to the notice of the<br />
VWA on 22 November 2004 after it was reported by another employee.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) and sections 21(1) & (2)(e) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act<br />
1985. Regulation 7 of the Occupational Health and Safety (Incident Notification) Regulations 1997.<br />
Result: Convicted and fined $10,000.<br />
36 PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>