15.01.2015 Views

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION 1<br />

HOIST HYDRAULICS (VIC) PTY LTD<br />

Date of offence: 11 November 2004<br />

Date of prosecution:<br />

Magistrate:<br />

Plea:<br />

9 December <strong>2005</strong> at Ringwood Magistrates’ Court<br />

His Honour Magistrate La Rosa<br />

Guilty<br />

On 11 November 2004, a metal trade’s assistant employed by Hoist Hydraulics (Vic) Pty Ltd was<br />

operating a machine known as a ‘rumbler’ that removes rough edges from cut metal components<br />

by rotating them. The employee had been instructed that because the on/off button did not work,<br />

he was to start and stop the machine by connecting and disconnecting the three-phase plug and<br />

extension lead that led to the machine. The extension lead was connected to a wall switch which<br />

was 30 to 40 paces away from the machine and in a position from which an operator could not see<br />

the machine.<br />

Whilst operating the machine the employee suffered an electric shock.<br />

The rumbler had been manufactured in-house several years earlier and was unsafe in the<br />

following respects:<br />

• it did not comply with Australian Standards regarding safeguarding of machinery;<br />

• numerous dangerous parts protruded from the machine, including the hinges and latches<br />

supporting the door, which created an entanglement hazard;<br />

• the hinges securing the door of the rumbler were cracked, creating a crushing hazard;<br />

• the rumbler’s on/off switch was broken;<br />

• there was no emergency stop button fitted;<br />

• the machine did not comply with Australian Standards regarding electrical installations;<br />

• the three-phase supply lead that fed power to the starter was frayed and damaged;<br />

• bare copper conductors were visible in the brown and blue active conductors;<br />

• the three phase plug connected to the supply lead for the machine showed signs of electrical arcing;<br />

• no risk assessment had been undertaken on it; and<br />

• employees were not provided with adequate instruction, information, training or supervision in<br />

regard to the risks associated with its operation.<br />

The defendant company did not notify the VWA of the incident. The incident came to the notice of the<br />

VWA on 22 November 2004 after it was reported by another employee.<br />

Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) and sections 21(1) & (2)(e) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act<br />

1985. Regulation 7 of the Occupational Health and Safety (Incident Notification) Regulations 1997.<br />

Result: Convicted and fined $10,000.<br />

36 PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!