Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS<br />
PAPER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD<br />
Date of offence: 19 December 2003<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
18 to 22 July <strong>2005</strong> at Moe Magistrates’ Court<br />
His Honour Magistrate Dugdale<br />
Not guilty<br />
On 19 December 2003 at the Paper Australia Pty Ltd Maryvale Mill at Morwell, an employee winder<br />
assistant was working at the mill on a machine known as ‘paper machine number five’.<br />
The employee was standing on a raised kick plate which was to the side of an operator platform.<br />
The platform was beside the winder section of the machine. The platform had a pressure plate<br />
under it, which when a person was standing on the platform, prevented the table on the machine<br />
moving. From time-to-time, the tail end sheet of the paper would ‘kick out’ and fall down<br />
underneath the paper reel of the machine.<br />
In order to avoid this happening, employees devised strategies to hold the paper up in place. One<br />
method was to use a broom handle with sticky tape on it and another was to hold the paper up with<br />
a long piece of PVC piping.<br />
On this day the employee leant across to the reel of paper to hold onto the sheet with his hand.<br />
The employee stood on the kick plate to reach out to hold the paper and as a consequence, the<br />
pressure plate was not activated and the table carrying the paper reel continued its downward<br />
motion, catching and severing the corner of the employee’s right boot between the table and the<br />
platform. The employee’s boot became trapped between the operator’s platform and a lowering<br />
table at the wind section of the machine. The employee’s big toe on his right foot was amputated.<br />
‘Paper machine number five’ was commissioned in July 1998, by its German manufacturer. At<br />
the time of commissioning, two of the manufacturer’s engineers conducted training sessions for<br />
employees. A number of employees found this training unsatisfactory because they had difficulty<br />
understanding the engineers’ broken English.<br />
A risk assessment and hazard identification was not performed in relation to the particular<br />
machine. Over time, certain written safety procedures were developed by the employees. These<br />
procedures did not, however, address the risks associated with an employee avoiding the operation<br />
of the pressure plate by standing on the adjacent kick plate.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a); sections 21(1) & (2)(b); and sections 21(1) & (2)(e) of the Occupational<br />
Health and Safety Act 1985. Regulation 704(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety (Plant)<br />
Regulations 1995.<br />
Result: Committed to stand trial in County Court<br />
PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong><br />
125