Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1<br />
BENDIGO SCAFFOLDING PTY LTD<br />
Date of offence: 14 October 2004<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Magistrate:<br />
Plea:<br />
8 December <strong>2005</strong> at Bendigo Magistrates’ Court<br />
His Honour Magistrate Gibb<br />
Guilty<br />
On 14 October 2004, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed two employees of Bendigo Scaffolding Pty<br />
Ltd undertaking unsafe work at a height while demolishing a building at Bendigo. The apex of the<br />
building was approximately eight metres high.<br />
The employees were observed working within two metres from the edge of the building without the<br />
provision of any safety mesh beneath the roof or any other form of fall protection being used.<br />
At the time, the employees were removing and carrying the steel roof sheets (eight metres<br />
long) from the west side of the roof. The employees were not wearing any safety harnesses. The<br />
employees gained access via a broken extension ladder that was not secured at the top or bottom.<br />
The ladder was approximately 3.5m from the ground. The employees used the ladder while<br />
carrying tools, hence they were not able to maintain, at all times, two hands on the ladder. Nor had<br />
employees been granted permission to use the ladder by another company that owned the ladder.<br />
Prior to 14 October <strong>2005</strong>, a health and safety representative (HSR) had inducted the employees<br />
together with their manager onto the site by providing them with an OHS booklet and showing them<br />
the job that was required to be undertaken. The HSR was assured by the manager of the defendant<br />
company that a safety harness and other fall protection would be used in undertaking the work.<br />
The defendant company had harnesses, scaffolding and a ladder, however, they were located off<br />
site at headquarters. It did not own an elevated work platform and there was no written job safety<br />
analysis for the work.<br />
The inspector issued two prohibition notices preventing the work from continuing without an<br />
appropriate fall arrest system and other fall protection equipment and preventing use of the unsafe<br />
and damaged extension ladder.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: Convicted and fined $14,000.<br />
10PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>