15.01.2015 Views

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 1<br />

BENDIGO SCAFFOLDING PTY LTD<br />

Date of offence: 14 October 2004<br />

Date of prosecution:<br />

Magistrate:<br />

Plea:<br />

8 December <strong>2005</strong> at Bendigo Magistrates’ Court<br />

His Honour Magistrate Gibb<br />

Guilty<br />

On 14 October 2004, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed two employees of Bendigo Scaffolding Pty<br />

Ltd undertaking unsafe work at a height while demolishing a building at Bendigo. The apex of the<br />

building was approximately eight metres high.<br />

The employees were observed working within two metres from the edge of the building without the<br />

provision of any safety mesh beneath the roof or any other form of fall protection being used.<br />

At the time, the employees were removing and carrying the steel roof sheets (eight metres<br />

long) from the west side of the roof. The employees were not wearing any safety harnesses. The<br />

employees gained access via a broken extension ladder that was not secured at the top or bottom.<br />

The ladder was approximately 3.5m from the ground. The employees used the ladder while<br />

carrying tools, hence they were not able to maintain, at all times, two hands on the ladder. Nor had<br />

employees been granted permission to use the ladder by another company that owned the ladder.<br />

Prior to 14 October <strong>2005</strong>, a health and safety representative (HSR) had inducted the employees<br />

together with their manager onto the site by providing them with an OHS booklet and showing them<br />

the job that was required to be undertaken. The HSR was assured by the manager of the defendant<br />

company that a safety harness and other fall protection would be used in undertaking the work.<br />

The defendant company had harnesses, scaffolding and a ladder, however, they were located off<br />

site at headquarters. It did not own an elevated work platform and there was no written job safety<br />

analysis for the work.<br />

The inspector issued two prohibition notices preventing the work from continuing without an<br />

appropriate fall arrest system and other fall protection equipment and preventing use of the unsafe<br />

and damaged extension ladder.<br />

Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />

Result: Convicted and fined $14,000.<br />

10PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!