Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 4<br />
MENG DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD<br />
Date of offence: Between 28 November 2000 and 26 June 2001<br />
Date of appeal:<br />
Justice:<br />
Plea:<br />
1 December <strong>2005</strong> at the Court of Criminal Appeal<br />
The Honourable Justice Williams<br />
No plea<br />
Meng Developments Pty Ltd lodged an application for judicial review of the decision from His<br />
Honour Judge Dyett. On 11 November 2004, His Honour dismissed Meng Developments Pty Ltd’s<br />
appeal against the sentencing order of His Honour Magistrate Walter made on 27 April 2004 at<br />
Ringwood Magistrates’ Court when His Honour convicted and fined Meng Developments Pty Ltd an<br />
aggregate sum of $12,000.<br />
On 28 November 2000, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector attended a multi-residential unit construction site in<br />
Lilydale. The inspector established the site was under the control of Peter Schierholter (a director<br />
of Meng Developments Pty Ltd). The inspector observed an electrical extension lead being run from<br />
a neighbouring dwelling across the ground onto the construction site. The inspector also observed<br />
that there were no site sheds, toilets and no provision for drinking water at the site.<br />
On 23 January 2001, a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed that the electrical extension cords and power<br />
tools were not tagged to demonstrate they had been tested pursuant to the relevant Code of<br />
Practice, and a temporary electrical switchboard used to power the site did not comply with the<br />
Code of Practice.<br />
On 23 February 2001, two <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspectors attended the site in response to a complaint of<br />
unsafe work at height and other safety issues. Further breaches regularly occurred in relation to<br />
various prohibition notices not being remedied.<br />
On 26 June 2001, Schierholter told a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector that he was banned from the site, at which<br />
point Schierholter was informed it was an offence to obstruct a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) (four charges) and sections 21(1) & (2)(d) (two charges) of the<br />
Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: The application was refused.<br />
134PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>