Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
Prosecutions 2005 (PDF 3269kb) - WorkSafe Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 1<br />
in place on either side of the hatch. These wing nuts had to be released using a shifting spanner.<br />
They lifted the grate on the mezzanine floor and reached down to the hatch. Employee ‘B’ began<br />
to release one wing nut and employee ‘A’ was working on the other. Both employees were on their<br />
knees in front of the hatch door. They had removed the wing nuts and employee ‘B’ was planning to<br />
get a crow bar to prise the hatch open when suddenly the lid of the hatch blew open and hot meal<br />
erupted from the opening.<br />
According to employee ‘B’ he felt a hot sudden rush of heat and heard a loud bang. The pressure<br />
from the hatch area knocked him back onto the mezzanine floor. Employee ‘B’s’ face was burnt - he<br />
made his way to the shower and saw that employee ‘A’ was already there with the shift supervisor.<br />
Employee ‘A’ was also injured.<br />
Both employee ‘A’ and employee ‘B’ were taken to the first aid room by the control room operator<br />
and the shift supervisor (both level two first aid trained) whom began to treat the burns on both<br />
men. There was only one sink with only one tap for running water in the first aid room. This meant<br />
that whilst injured employee ‘B’ had his hand under running water, the control room operator had<br />
to go to the toilets to get to a tap to wet the bandages to treat injured employee ‘A’. There was no<br />
emergency shower in the first aid room which meant the closest shower was 15 to 20 metres away.<br />
The control room operator could not get into the supply cupboard to obtain more bandages to place<br />
on injured employee ‘B’s’ legs because it was locked.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a); sections 21(1) & (2)(d); and sections 21(1) & (2)(e) of the Occupational<br />
Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: Convicted and fined an aggregate sum of $70,000.<br />
BONNEY PRODUCE PTY LTD<br />
Date of offences: 3 January and 14 September 2002<br />
Date of prosecution:<br />
Judge:<br />
Plea:<br />
7 June <strong>2005</strong> at Melbourne County Court<br />
His Honour Judge Barnett<br />
Guilty<br />
On 3 January 2002, employees of Bonney Produce Pty Ltd were observed using a forklift in an<br />
unsafe manner. A forklift was being used to raise steel fascia formwork panels and tools to the roof<br />
of the workplace. The panels were balanced on top of 16 pallets stacked and tied onto the tynes of<br />
the forklift. The forklift was parked at right angles to the building, across the footpath on Whitehall<br />
Street, Footscray. One employee raised the tynes of the forklift to a level where the panels could be<br />
pulled from the top of the stack of pallets and onto the roof using ropes. The employee working on<br />
the roof then secured the panels to the front to the building. This process was repeated for each of<br />
four panels until a <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector directed the work to cease.<br />
On 14 September 2002, employees of Bonney Produce Pty Ltd were again observed using a forklift<br />
in an unsafe manner. A <strong>WorkSafe</strong> inspector observed a forklift parked on the footpath of Whitehall<br />
Street with the mast raised to full height. A personnel cage was resting on a number of wooden<br />
pallets, tied to the tynes and mast of the forklift with ropes. The inspector observed a person<br />
working from the cage, scraping paint from the façade of the building. The inspector also observed<br />
there was no-one in the operator’s seat of the forklift.<br />
Breach: Sections 21(1) & (2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985.<br />
Result: Convicted and fined $10,000.<br />
14PROSECUTIONS <strong>2005</strong>